gsd-2024-1342
Vulnerability from gsd
Modified
2024-02-08 06:02
Details
A flaw was found in OpenShift. The existing Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) protections in place do not properly protect GET requests, allowing for the creation of WebSockets via CSRF.
Aliases
{ "gsd": { "metadata": { "exploitCode": "unknown", "remediation": "unknown", "reportConfidence": "confirmed", "type": "vulnerability" }, "osvSchema": { "aliases": [ "CVE-2024-1342" ], "details": "A flaw was found in OpenShift. The existing Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) protections in place do not properly protect GET requests, allowing for the creation of WebSockets via CSRF.", "id": "GSD-2024-1342", "modified": "2024-02-08T06:02:25.132686Z", "schema_version": "1.4.0" } }, "namespaces": { "cve.org": { "CVE_data_meta": { "ASSIGNER": "secalert@redhat.com", "ID": "CVE-2024-1342", "STATE": "PUBLIC" }, "affects": { "vendor": { "vendor_data": [ { "product": { "product_data": [ { "product_name": "Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4", "version": { "version_data": [ { "version_value": "not down converted", "x_cve_json_5_version_data": { "defaultStatus": "affected" } } ] } } ] }, "vendor_name": "Red Hat" } ] } }, "credits": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "Red Hat would like to thank Cyber Controls team (SIX Group) for reporting this issue." } ], "data_format": "MITRE", "data_type": "CVE", "data_version": "4.0", "description": { "description_data": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "A flaw was found in OpenShift. The existing Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) protections in place do not properly protect GET requests, allowing for the creation of WebSockets via CSRF." } ] }, "impact": { "cvss": [ { "attackComplexity": "LOW", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "NONE", "baseScore": 5.4, "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "LOW", "integrityImpact": "LOW", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N", "version": "3.1" } ] }, "problemtype": { "problemtype_data": [ { "description": [ { "cweId": "CWE-352", "lang": "eng", "value": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)" } ] } ] }, "references": { "reference_data": [ { "name": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-1342", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-1342" }, { "name": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259960", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259960" } ] } }, "nvd.nist.gov": { "cve": { "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "A flaw was found in OpenShift. The existing Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) protections in place do not properly protect GET requests, allowing for the creation of WebSockets via CSRF." } ], "id": "CVE-2024-1342", "lastModified": "2024-02-16T19:26:55.393", "metrics": { "cvssMetricV31": [ { "cvssData": { "attackComplexity": "LOW", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "NONE", "baseScore": 5.4, "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "LOW", "integrityImpact": "LOW", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N", "version": "3.1" }, "exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "impactScore": 2.5, "source": "secalert@redhat.com", "type": "Secondary" } ] }, "published": "2024-02-16T16:15:57.543", "references": [ { "source": "secalert@redhat.com", "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-1342" }, { "source": "secalert@redhat.com", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259960" } ], "sourceIdentifier": "secalert@redhat.com", "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis", "weaknesses": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "CWE-352" } ], "source": "secalert@redhat.com", "type": "Primary" } ] } } } }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.