jvndb-2002-000291
Vulnerability from jvndb
Published
2008-05-21 00:00
Modified
2008-05-21 00:00
Severity ?
() - -
Summary
Canna irw_through Buffer Overflow Vulnerability
Details
Canna contains a buffer overflow vulnerability in the irw_through function.
Impacted products
Show details on JVN DB website


{
  "@rdf:about": "https://jvndb.jvn.jp/en/contents/2002/JVNDB-2002-000291.html",
  "dc:date": "2008-05-21T00:00+09:00",
  "dcterms:issued": "2008-05-21T00:00+09:00",
  "dcterms:modified": "2008-05-21T00:00+09:00",
  "description": "Canna contains a buffer overflow vulnerability in the irw_through function.",
  "link": "https://jvndb.jvn.jp/en/contents/2002/JVNDB-2002-000291.html",
  "sec:cpe": [
    {
      "#text": "cpe:/a:canna:canna",
      "@product": "Canna",
      "@vendor": "Canna Project.",
      "@version": "2.2"
    },
    {
      "#text": "cpe:/o:redhat:linux",
      "@product": "Red Hat Linux",
      "@vendor": "Red Hat, Inc.",
      "@version": "2.2"
    }
  ],
  "sec:cvss": {
    "@score": "7.2",
    "@severity": "High",
    "@type": "Base",
    "@vector": "AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C",
    "@version": "2.0"
  },
  "sec:identifier": "JVNDB-2002-000291",
  "sec:references": [
    {
      "#text": "http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2002-1158",
      "@id": "CVE-2002-1158",
      "@source": "CVE"
    },
    {
      "#text": "http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2002-1158",
      "@id": "CVE-2002-1158",
      "@source": "NVD"
    },
    {
      "#text": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/6351",
      "@id": "6351",
      "@source": "BID"
    },
    {
      "#text": "http://xforce.iss.net/xforce/xfdb/10831",
      "@id": "10831",
      "@source": "XF"
    }
  ],
  "title": "Canna irw_through Buffer Overflow Vulnerability"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.