jvndb-2004-000170
Vulnerability from jvndb
Published
2008-05-21 00:00
Modified
2008-05-21 00:00
Severity ?
() - -
Summary
Lha Directory Traversal Vulnerability in Testing and Extracting Process
Details
LHa for UNIX is vulnerable to directory traversal due to improper path validation when testing or extracting an archive.
References
CVE http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2004-0235
NVD http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2004-0235
OVAL http://oval.mitre.org/repository/data/getDef?id=oval:org.mitre.oval:def:978
BID http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/10243
BID http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=108422737918885&w=2
XF http://xforce.iss.net/xforce/xfdb/16013
Impacted products
LHa for UNIX projectLHa for UNIX
Red Hat, Inc.Red Hat Enterprise Linux
Red Hat, Inc.Red Hat Enterprise Linux Desktop
Red Hat, Inc.Red Hat Linux
Red Hat, Inc.Red Hat Linux Advanced Workstation
Show details on JVN DB website

To clipboard 

{
   "@rdf:about": "https://jvndb.jvn.jp/en/contents/2004/JVNDB-2004-000170.html",
   "dc:date": "2008-05-21T00:00+09:00",
   "dcterms:issued": "2008-05-21T00:00+09:00",
   "dcterms:modified": "2008-05-21T00:00+09:00",
   description: "LHa for UNIX is vulnerable to directory traversal due to improper path validation when testing or extracting an archive.",
   link: "https://jvndb.jvn.jp/en/contents/2004/JVNDB-2004-000170.html",
   "sec:cpe": [
      {
         "#text": "cpe:/a:lha_for_unix_project:lha_for_unix",
         "@product": "LHa for UNIX",
         "@vendor": "LHa for UNIX project",
         "@version": "2.2",
      },
      {
         "#text": "cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux",
         "@product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux",
         "@vendor": "Red Hat, Inc.",
         "@version": "2.2",
      },
      {
         "#text": "cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux_desktop",
         "@product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux Desktop",
         "@vendor": "Red Hat, Inc.",
         "@version": "2.2",
      },
      {
         "#text": "cpe:/o:redhat:linux",
         "@product": "Red Hat Linux",
         "@vendor": "Red Hat, Inc.",
         "@version": "2.2",
      },
      {
         "#text": "cpe:/o:redhat:linux_advanced_workstation",
         "@product": "Red Hat Linux Advanced Workstation",
         "@vendor": "Red Hat, Inc.",
         "@version": "2.2",
      },
   ],
   "sec:cvss": {
      "@score": "6.4",
      "@severity": "Medium",
      "@type": "Base",
      "@vector": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N",
      "@version": "2.0",
   },
   "sec:identifier": "JVNDB-2004-000170",
   "sec:references": [
      {
         "#text": "http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2004-0235",
         "@id": "CVE-2004-0235",
         "@source": "CVE",
      },
      {
         "#text": "http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2004-0235",
         "@id": "CVE-2004-0235",
         "@source": "NVD",
      },
      {
         "#text": "http://oval.mitre.org/repository/data/getDef?id=oval:org.mitre.oval:def:978",
         "@id": "978",
         "@source": "OVAL",
      },
      {
         "#text": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/10243",
         "@id": "10243",
         "@source": "BID",
      },
      {
         "#text": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=108422737918885&w=2",
         "@id": "LHA Advisory + Patch",
         "@source": "BID",
      },
      {
         "#text": "http://xforce.iss.net/xforce/xfdb/16013",
         "@id": "16013",
         "@source": "XF",
      },
   ],
   title: "Lha Directory Traversal Vulnerability in Testing and Extracting Process",
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Security Advisory comment format.

This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.

UUIDv4 of the comment
UUIDv4 of the Vulnerability-Lookup instance
When the comment was created originally
When the comment was last updated
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
The identifier of the vulnerability (CVE ID, GHSA-ID, PYSEC ID, etc.).



Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.