jvndb-2004-000179
Vulnerability from jvndb
Published
2008-05-21 00:00
Modified
2008-05-21 00:00
Summary
DeleGate SSLway Filter Buffer Overflow Vulnerability
Details
Delegate SSLway Filter contains a buffer overflow vulnerability which stems from lack of memory space to handle SSL certificates.
References
Impacted products
▼ | Vendor | Product |
---|---|---|
DeleGate.org | DeleGate |
{ "@rdf:about": "https://jvndb.jvn.jp/en/contents/2004/JVNDB-2004-000179.html", "dc:date": "2008-05-21T00:00+09:00", "dcterms:issued": "2008-05-21T00:00+09:00", "dcterms:modified": "2008-05-21T00:00+09:00", "description": "Delegate SSLway Filter contains a buffer overflow vulnerability which stems from lack of memory space to handle SSL certificates.", "link": "https://jvndb.jvn.jp/en/contents/2004/JVNDB-2004-000179.html", "sec:cpe": { "#text": "cpe:/a:delegate:delegate", "@product": "DeleGate", "@vendor": "DeleGate.org", "@version": "2.2" }, "sec:cvss": { "@score": "7.5", "@severity": "High", "@type": "Base", "@vector": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P", "@version": "2.0" }, "sec:identifier": "JVNDB-2004-000179", "sec:references": [ { "#text": "http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2004-2003", "@id": "CVE-2004-2003", "@source": "CVE" }, { "#text": "http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2004-2003", "@id": "CVE-2004-2003", "@source": "NVD" }, { "#text": "http://secunia.com/advisories/11569", "@id": "SA11569", "@source": "SECUNIA" }, { "#text": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/10295", "@id": "10295", "@source": "BID" }, { "#text": "http://xforce.iss.net/xforce/xfdb/16078", "@id": "16078", "@source": "XF" }, { "#text": "http://www.securiteam.com/securitynews/5UP041PCUC.html", "@id": "5UP041PCUC", "@source": "SECTEAM" }, { "#text": "http://www.osvdb.org/5945", "@id": "5945", "@source": "OSVDB" } ], "title": "DeleGate SSLway Filter Buffer Overflow Vulnerability" }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.