jvndb-2004-000554
Vulnerability from jvndb
Published
2008-05-21 00:00
Modified
2008-05-21 00:00
Summary
Namazu cross-site scripting vulnerability
Details
Namazu is vulnerable to cross-site scripting due to a problem in namazu.cgi. If an illegal character is specified in a string search of namazu.cgi, the subsequent characters are not processed properly.
References
Impacted products
▼ | Vendor | Product |
---|---|---|
Namazu Project. | Namazu | |
Cybertrust Japan Co., Ltd. | Asianux Server |
{ "@rdf:about": "https://jvndb.jvn.jp/en/contents/2004/JVNDB-2004-000554.html", "dc:date": "2008-05-21T00:00+09:00", "dcterms:issued": "2008-05-21T00:00+09:00", "dcterms:modified": "2008-05-21T00:00+09:00", "description": "Namazu is vulnerable to cross-site scripting due to a problem in namazu.cgi. If an illegal character is specified in a string search of namazu.cgi, the subsequent characters are not processed properly.", "link": "https://jvndb.jvn.jp/en/contents/2004/JVNDB-2004-000554.html", "sec:cpe": [ { "#text": "cpe:/a:namazu:namazu", "@product": "Namazu", "@vendor": "Namazu Project. ", "@version": "2.2" }, { "#text": "cpe:/o:misc:miraclelinux_asianux_server", "@product": "Asianux Server", "@vendor": "Cybertrust Japan Co., Ltd.", "@version": "2.2" } ], "sec:cvss": { "@score": "4.3", "@severity": "Medium", "@type": "Base", "@vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N", "@version": "2.0" }, "sec:identifier": "JVNDB-2004-000554", "sec:references": [ { "#text": "http://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN904429FE/", "@id": "JVN#904429FE", "@source": "JVN" }, { "#text": "http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2004-1318", "@id": "CVE-2004-1318", "@source": "CVE" }, { "#text": "http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2004-1318", "@id": "CVE-2004-1318", "@source": "NVD" }, { "#text": "http://secunia.com/advisories/13600/", "@id": "SA13600", "@source": "SECUNIA" }, { "#text": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/12053", "@id": "12053", "@source": "BID" } ], "title": "Namazu cross-site scripting vulnerability" }
Loading...
Loading...
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.