jvndb-2005-000756
Vulnerability from jvndb
Published
2008-05-21 00:00
Modified
2008-05-21 00:00
Summary
Tsuru-Kame Mail vulnerable in S/MIME signature verification
Details
Tsuru-Kame Mail contains the following vulnerabilities in the S/MIME signature verification:
- S/MIME signature verification does not verify the certification path.
- S/MIME signature verification does not verify the certification expiration date.
The name of the software "Tsuru-Kame Mail" was changed to "Hidemaru Mail" on August 10, 2005.
Impacted products
▼ | Vendor | Product |
---|---|---|
Saitoh Kikaku | Hidemaru Mail |
{ "@rdf:about": "https://jvndb.jvn.jp/en/contents/2005/JVNDB-2005-000756.html", "dc:date": "2008-05-21T00:00+09:00", "dcterms:issued": "2008-05-21T00:00+09:00", "dcterms:modified": "2008-05-21T00:00+09:00", "description": "Tsuru-Kame Mail contains the following vulnerabilities in the S/MIME signature verification:\r\n- S/MIME signature verification does not verify the certification path.\r\n- S/MIME signature verification does not verify the certification expiration date.\r\n\r\nThe name of the software \"Tsuru-Kame Mail\" was changed to \"Hidemaru Mail\" on August 10, 2005.", "link": "https://jvndb.jvn.jp/en/contents/2005/JVNDB-2005-000756.html", "sec:cpe": { "#text": "cpe:/a:hidemaru:hidemaru_mail", "@product": "Hidemaru Mail", "@vendor": "Saitoh Kikaku", "@version": "2.2" }, "sec:cvss": { "@score": "5.0", "@severity": "Medium", "@type": "Base", "@vector": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N", "@version": "2.0" }, "sec:identifier": "JVNDB-2005-000756", "sec:references": { "#text": "http://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVNE59B594B/index.html", "@id": "JVN#E59B594B", "@source": "JVN" }, "title": "Tsuru-Kame Mail vulnerable in S/MIME signature verification" }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.