JVNDB-2005-000798

Vulnerability from jvndb - Published: 2008-05-21 00:00 - Updated:2008-05-21 00:00
Severity ?
() - -
Summary
MitakeSearch cross-site scripting vulnerability
Details
MitakeSearch, a fulltext search system from Hewlett-Packard Japan, contains a cross-site scripting vulnerability due to improper validation of input character strings in the ranking CGI script file, ranking.pl.
Show details on JVN DB website

{
  "@rdf:about": "https://jvndb.jvn.jp/en/contents/2005/JVNDB-2005-000798.html",
  "dc:date": "2008-05-21T00:00+09:00",
  "dcterms:issued": "2008-05-21T00:00+09:00",
  "dcterms:modified": "2008-05-21T00:00+09:00",
  "description": "MitakeSearch, a fulltext search system from Hewlett-Packard Japan, contains a cross-site scripting vulnerability due to improper validation of input character strings in the ranking CGI script file, ranking.pl.",
  "link": "https://jvndb.jvn.jp/en/contents/2005/JVNDB-2005-000798.html",
  "sec:cpe": {
    "#text": "cpe:/a:hp:mitakesearch",
    "@product": "MitakeSearch",
    "@vendor": "Hewlett-Packard Development Company,L.P",
    "@version": "2.2"
  },
  "sec:cvss": {
    "@score": "4.3",
    "@severity": "Medium",
    "@type": "Base",
    "@vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N",
    "@version": "2.0"
  },
  "sec:identifier": "JVNDB-2005-000798",
  "sec:references": {
    "#text": "http://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN76357668/index.html",
    "@id": "JVN#76357668",
    "@source": "JVN"
  },
  "title": "MitakeSearch cross-site scripting vulnerability"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…