JVNDB-2006-000639
Vulnerability from jvndb - Published: 2008-06-10 13:57 - Updated:2008-06-10 13:57Summary
Pixelpost cross-site scripting vulnerability
Details
Pixelpost, an open source content management system used for photo albums, etc., contains a cross-site scripting vulnerability.
Daiki Fukumori of Secure Sky Technology, Inc. reported this vulnerability to IPA.
JPCERT/CC coordinated with the vendors under Information Security Early Warning Partnership.
References
| Type | URL | |
|---|---|---|
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | |
|---|---|---|
{
"@rdf:about": "https://jvndb.jvn.jp/en/contents/2006/JVNDB-2006-000639.html",
"dc:date": "2008-06-10T13:57+09:00",
"dcterms:issued": "2008-06-10T13:57+09:00",
"dcterms:modified": "2008-06-10T13:57+09:00",
"description": "Pixelpost, an open source content management system used for photo albums, etc., contains a cross-site scripting vulnerability.\r\n\r\nDaiki Fukumori of Secure Sky Technology, Inc. reported this vulnerability to IPA.\r\nJPCERT/CC coordinated with the vendors under Information Security Early Warning Partnership.",
"link": "https://jvndb.jvn.jp/en/contents/2006/JVNDB-2006-000639.html",
"sec:cpe": {
"#text": "cpe:/a:pixelpost:pixelpost",
"@product": "Pixelpost ",
"@vendor": "Pixelpost.org",
"@version": "2.2"
},
"sec:cvss": {
"@score": "2.6",
"@severity": "Low",
"@type": "Base",
"@vector": "AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N",
"@version": "2.0"
},
"sec:identifier": "JVNDB-2006-000639",
"sec:references": {
"#text": "http://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN65677118/index.html",
"@id": "JVN#65677118",
"@source": "JVN"
},
"title": "Pixelpost cross-site scripting vulnerability"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…