JVNDB-2006-000654

Vulnerability from jvndb - Published: 2008-05-21 00:00 - Updated:2008-05-21 00:00
Severity ?
() - -
Summary
SugarCRM cross-site scripting vulnerability
Details
SugarCRM, an open source CRM (Customer Relationship Management) package, contains a cross-site scripting vulnerability.
References
Impacted products
Show details on JVN DB website
To clipboard 

{
  "@rdf:about": "https://jvndb.jvn.jp/en/contents/2006/JVNDB-2006-000654.html",
  "dc:date": "2008-05-21T00:00+09:00",
  "dcterms:issued": "2008-05-21T00:00+09:00",
  "dcterms:modified": "2008-05-21T00:00+09:00",
  "description": "SugarCRM, an open source CRM (Customer Relationship Management) package, contains a cross-site scripting vulnerability.",
  "link": "https://jvndb.jvn.jp/en/contents/2006/JVNDB-2006-000654.html",
  "sec:cpe": {
    "#text": "cpe:/a:sugarcrm:sugarcrm",
    "@product": "SugarCRM",
    "@vendor": "SugarCRM",
    "@version": "2.2"
  },
  "sec:cvss": {
    "@score": "2.6",
    "@severity": "Low",
    "@type": "Base",
    "@vector": "AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N",
    "@version": "2.0"
  },
  "sec:identifier": "JVNDB-2006-000654",
  "sec:references": {
    "#text": "http://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN30144870/index.html",
    "@id": "JVN#30144870",
    "@source": "JVN"
  },
  "title": "SugarCRM cross-site scripting vulnerability"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.