JVNDB-2007-000491

Vulnerability from jvndb - Published: 2008-05-21 00:00 - Updated:2008-05-21 00:00
Severity ?
() - -
Summary
Lhaca LHZ Archive Extended Header Size Processing Buffer Overflow Vulnerability
Details
Lhaca does not process an LHZ archive with an invalid Extended Header Size properly, which could lead to buffer overflow. This problem is reported to be different from the issue identified in JVNDB-2007-000492 (CVE-2007-3375).
Impacted products
Show details on JVN DB website

{
  "@rdf:about": "https://jvndb.jvn.jp/en/contents/2007/JVNDB-2007-000491.html",
  "dc:date": "2008-05-21T00:00+09:00",
  "dcterms:issued": "2008-05-21T00:00+09:00",
  "dcterms:modified": "2008-05-21T00:00+09:00",
  "description": "Lhaca does not process an LHZ archive with an invalid Extended Header Size properly, which could lead to buffer overflow.\r\nThis problem is reported to be different from the issue identified in JVNDB-2007-000492 (CVE-2007-3375).",
  "link": "https://jvndb.jvn.jp/en/contents/2007/JVNDB-2007-000491.html",
  "sec:cpe": {
    "#text": "cpe:/a:lhaca:file_archiver",
    "@product": "Lhaca",
    "@vendor": "Lhaca",
    "@version": "2.2"
  },
  "sec:cvss": {
    "@score": "9.3",
    "@severity": "High",
    "@type": "Base",
    "@vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C",
    "@version": "2.0"
  },
  "sec:identifier": "JVNDB-2007-000491",
  "sec:references": [
    {
      "#text": "http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2007-3512",
      "@id": "CVE-2007-3512",
      "@source": "CVE"
    },
    {
      "#text": "http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2007-3512",
      "@id": "CVE-2007-3512",
      "@source": "NVD"
    },
    {
      "#text": "http://secunia.com/advisories/25797",
      "@id": "SA25797",
      "@source": "SECUNIA"
    },
    {
      "#text": "http://www.frsirt.com/english/advisories/2007/2399",
      "@id": "FrSIRT/ADV-2007-2399",
      "@source": "FRSIRT"
    }
  ],
  "title": "Lhaca LHZ Archive Extended Header Size Processing Buffer Overflow Vulnerability"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…