jvndb-2008-001575
Vulnerability from jvndb
Published
2008-09-03 12:33
Modified
2008-09-03 12:33
Severity ?
() - -
Summary
Fujitsu Interstage Application Server Single Sign-On Buffer Overflow Vulnerability
Details
The Single Sign-On function in Fujitsu Interstage Application Server has a buffer overflow vulnerability due to improper URI handling.
Show details on JVN DB website


{
   "@rdf:about": "https://jvndb.jvn.jp/en/contents/2008/JVNDB-2008-001575.html",
   "dc:date": "2008-09-03T12:33+09:00",
   "dcterms:issued": "2008-09-03T12:33+09:00",
   "dcterms:modified": "2008-09-03T12:33+09:00",
   description: "The Single Sign-On function in Fujitsu Interstage Application Server has a buffer overflow vulnerability due to improper URI handling.",
   link: "https://jvndb.jvn.jp/en/contents/2008/JVNDB-2008-001575.html",
   "sec:cpe": [
      {
         "#text": "cpe:/a:fujitsu:interstage_application_server",
         "@product": "Interstage Application Server",
         "@vendor": "FUJITSU",
         "@version": "2.2",
      },
      {
         "#text": "cpe:/a:fujitsu:interstage_apworks",
         "@product": "Interstage Apworks",
         "@vendor": "FUJITSU",
         "@version": "2.2",
      },
      {
         "#text": "cpe:/a:fujitsu:interstage_business_application_server",
         "@product": "Interstage Business Application Server",
         "@vendor": "FUJITSU",
         "@version": "2.2",
      },
      {
         "#text": "cpe:/a:fujitsu:interstage_job_workload_server",
         "@product": "Interstage Job Workload Server",
         "@vendor": "FUJITSU",
         "@version": "2.2",
      },
      {
         "#text": "cpe:/a:fujitsu:interstage_studio",
         "@product": "Interstage Studio",
         "@vendor": "FUJITSU",
         "@version": "2.2",
      },
   ],
   "sec:cvss": {
      "@score": "10.0",
      "@severity": "High",
      "@type": "Base",
      "@vector": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C",
      "@version": "2.0",
   },
   "sec:identifier": "JVNDB-2008-001575",
   "sec:references": [
      {
         "#text": "http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2008-1040",
         "@id": "CVE-2008-1040",
         "@source": "CVE",
      },
      {
         "#text": "http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2008-1040",
         "@id": "CVE-2008-1040",
         "@source": "NVD",
      },
      {
         "#text": "http://secunia.com/advisories/29088",
         "@id": "SA29088",
         "@source": "SECUNIA",
      },
      {
         "#text": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/27966",
         "@id": "27966",
         "@source": "BID",
      },
      {
         "#text": "http://www.frsirt.com/english/advisories/2008/0662",
         "@id": "FrSIRT/ADV-2008-0662",
         "@source": "FRSIRT",
      },
      {
         "#text": "http://jvndb.jvn.jp/ja/contents/2008/JVNDB-2008-001575.html",
         "@id": "JVNDB-2008-001575",
         "@source": "JVNDB_Ja",
      },
      {
         "#text": "https://www.ipa.go.jp/en/security/vulnerabilities/cwe.html",
         "@id": "CWE-119",
         "@title": "Buffer Errors(CWE-119)",
      },
   ],
   title: "Fujitsu Interstage Application Server Single Sign-On Buffer Overflow Vulnerability",
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Security Advisory comment format.

This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.

UUIDv4 of the comment
UUIDv4 of the Vulnerability-Lookup instance
When the comment was created originally
When the comment was last updated
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
The identifier of the vulnerability (CVE ID, GHSA-ID, PYSEC ID, etc.).



Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.