jvndb-2011-000047
Vulnerability from jvndb
Published
2011-06-24 19:23
Modified
2011-06-24 19:23
Severity ?
() - -
Summary
Cybozu Office vulnerable to cross-site scripting
Details
Cybozu Office contains a cross-site scripting vulnerability. Cybozu Office is a groupware. Cybozu Office contains a cross-site scripting vulnerability due to issues contained in the address book and user list functions. NetAgent Co.,Ltd. reported this vulnerability to IPA. JPCERT/CC coordinated with the developer under Information Security Early Warning Partnership.
References
JVN https://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN55508059
CVE http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2011-1335
NVD http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2011-1335
SECUNIA http://secunia.com/advisories/44992
SECUNIA http://secunia.com/advisories/45050
BID http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/48446
Cross-site Scripting(CWE-79) https://www.ipa.go.jp/en/security/vulnerabilities/cwe.html
Impacted products
Cybozu, Inc.Cybozu Office
Show details on JVN DB website

To clipboard 

{
   "@rdf:about": "https://jvndb.jvn.jp/en/contents/2011/JVNDB-2011-000047.html",
   "dc:date": "2011-06-24T19:23+09:00",
   "dcterms:issued": "2011-06-24T19:23+09:00",
   "dcterms:modified": "2011-06-24T19:23+09:00",
   description: "Cybozu Office contains a cross-site scripting vulnerability.\r\n\r\nCybozu Office is a groupware. Cybozu Office contains a cross-site scripting vulnerability due to issues contained in the address book and user list functions.\r\n\r\nNetAgent Co.,Ltd. reported this vulnerability to IPA.\r\nJPCERT/CC coordinated with the developer under Information Security Early Warning Partnership.",
   link: "https://jvndb.jvn.jp/en/contents/2011/JVNDB-2011-000047.html",
   "sec:cpe": {
      "#text": "cpe:/a:cybozu:office",
      "@product": "Cybozu Office",
      "@vendor": "Cybozu, Inc.",
      "@version": "2.2",
   },
   "sec:cvss": {
      "@score": "4.0",
      "@severity": "Medium",
      "@type": "Base",
      "@vector": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:P/A:N",
      "@version": "2.0",
   },
   "sec:identifier": "JVNDB-2011-000047",
   "sec:references": [
      {
         "#text": "https://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN55508059",
         "@id": "JVN#55508059",
         "@source": "JVN",
      },
      {
         "#text": "http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2011-1335",
         "@id": "CVE-2011-1335",
         "@source": "CVE",
      },
      {
         "#text": "http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2011-1335",
         "@id": "CVE-2011-1335",
         "@source": "NVD",
      },
      {
         "#text": "http://secunia.com/advisories/44992",
         "@id": "SA44992 ",
         "@source": "SECUNIA",
      },
      {
         "#text": "http://secunia.com/advisories/45050",
         "@id": "SA45050 ",
         "@source": "SECUNIA",
      },
      {
         "#text": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/48446",
         "@id": "48446",
         "@source": "BID",
      },
      {
         "#text": "https://www.ipa.go.jp/en/security/vulnerabilities/cwe.html",
         "@id": "CWE-79",
         "@title": "Cross-site Scripting(CWE-79)",
      },
   ],
   title: "Cybozu Office vulnerable to cross-site scripting",
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Security Advisory comment format.

This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.

UUIDv4 of the comment
UUIDv4 of the Vulnerability-Lookup instance
When the comment was created originally
When the comment was last updated
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
The identifier of the vulnerability (CVE ID, GHSA-ID, PYSEC ID, etc.).



Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.