jvndb-2014-000058
Vulnerability from jvndb
Published
2014-06-20 13:56
Modified
2014-07-23 10:59
Summary
Usermin vulnerable to cross-site scripting
Details
Usermin is a web-based interface used to manage webmail. Usermin contains a cross-site scripting vulnerability.
Keigo Yamazaki of LAC Co., Ltd reported this vulnerability to IPA.
JPCERT/CC coordinated with the developer under Information Security Early Warning Partnership.
References
Impacted products
▼ | Vendor | Product |
---|---|---|
Webmin Project | Usermin |
{ "@rdf:about": "https://jvndb.jvn.jp/en/contents/2014/JVNDB-2014-000058.html", "dc:date": "2014-07-23T10:59+09:00", "dcterms:issued": "2014-06-20T13:56+09:00", "dcterms:modified": "2014-07-23T10:59+09:00", "description": "Usermin is a web-based interface used to manage webmail. Usermin contains a cross-site scripting vulnerability.\r\n\r\nKeigo Yamazaki of LAC Co., Ltd reported this vulnerability to IPA.\r\nJPCERT/CC coordinated with the developer under Information Security Early Warning Partnership.", "link": "https://jvndb.jvn.jp/en/contents/2014/JVNDB-2014-000058.html", "sec:cpe": { "#text": "cpe:/a:webmin:usermin", "@product": "Usermin", "@vendor": "Webmin Project", "@version": "2.2" }, "sec:cvss": { "@score": "4.3", "@severity": "Medium", "@type": "Base", "@vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N", "@version": "2.0" }, "sec:identifier": "JVNDB-2014-000058", "sec:references": [ { "#text": "http://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN92737498/index.html", "@id": "JVN#92737498", "@source": "JVN" }, { "#text": "http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2014-3884", "@id": "CVE-2014-3884", "@source": "CVE" }, { "#text": "http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2014-3884", "@id": "CVE-2014-3884", "@source": "NVD" }, { "#text": "https://www.ipa.go.jp/en/security/vulnerabilities/cwe.html", "@id": "CWE-79", "@title": "Cross-site Scripting(CWE-79)" } ], "title": "Usermin vulnerable to cross-site scripting" }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.