jvndb-2015-000180
Vulnerability from jvndb
Published
2015-11-13 14:25
Modified
2015-11-17 16:21
Summary
pWebManager vulnerable to OS command injection
Details
pWebManager provided by PC-EGG Co.,Ltd. contains an OS command injection vulnerability (CWE-78).
Shoji Baba reported this vulnerability to IPA.
JPCERT/CC coordinated with the developer under Information Security Early Warning Partnership.
References
Impacted products
▼ | Vendor | Product |
---|---|---|
PC-EGG Co.,Ltd. | pWebManager |
{ "@rdf:about": "https://jvndb.jvn.jp/en/contents/2015/JVNDB-2015-000180.html", "dc:date": "2015-11-17T16:21+09:00", "dcterms:issued": "2015-11-13T14:25+09:00", "dcterms:modified": "2015-11-17T16:21+09:00", "description": "pWebManager provided by PC-EGG Co.,Ltd. contains an OS command injection vulnerability (CWE-78).\r\n\r\nShoji Baba reported this vulnerability to IPA.\r\nJPCERT/CC coordinated with the developer under Information Security Early Warning Partnership.", "link": "https://jvndb.jvn.jp/en/contents/2015/JVNDB-2015-000180.html", "sec:cpe": { "#text": "cpe:/a:pc-egg:pwebmanager", "@product": "pWebManager", "@vendor": "PC-EGG Co.,Ltd.", "@version": "2.2" }, "sec:cvss": { "@score": "6.5", "@severity": "Medium", "@type": "Base", "@vector": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P", "@version": "2.0" }, "sec:identifier": "JVNDB-2015-000180", "sec:references": [ { "#text": "https://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN25323093/index.html", "@id": "JVN#25323093", "@source": "JVN" }, { "#text": "https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-7774", "@id": "CVE-2015-7774", "@source": "CVE" }, { "#text": "https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2015-7774", "@id": "CVE-2015-7774", "@source": "NVD" }, { "#text": "https://www.ipa.go.jp/en/security/vulnerabilities/cwe.html", "@id": "CWE-78", "@title": "OS Command Injection(CWE-78)" } ], "title": "pWebManager vulnerable to OS command injection" }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.