jvndb-2016-000097
Vulnerability from jvndb
Published
2016-06-07 16:26
Modified
2016-12-05 16:59
Severity ?
4.8 (Medium) - cvssV3_0 - CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
Summary
Apache Struts 1 vulnerable to input validation bypass
Details
The Apache Struts 1 Validator contains a vulnerability where input validation configurations (validation rules, error messages, etc.) may be modified. This occurs when the following ActionForm (including its subclasses) are in the session scope. * ValidatorForm * ValidatorActionForm
References
JVN https://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN65044642/index.html
CVE https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-1182
NVD https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2016-1182
Related document https://github.com/kawasima/struts1-forever/commit/eda3a79907ed8fcb0387a0496d0cb14332f250e8
No Mapping(CWE-Other) https://www.ipa.go.jp/en/security/vulnerabilities/cwe.html
Impacted products
Apache Software FoundationApache Struts
Show details on JVN DB website

To clipboard 

{
   "@rdf:about": "https://jvndb.jvn.jp/en/contents/2016/JVNDB-2016-000097.html",
   "dc:date": "2016-12-05T16:59+09:00",
   "dcterms:issued": "2016-06-07T16:26+09:00",
   "dcterms:modified": "2016-12-05T16:59+09:00",
   description: "The Apache Struts 1 Validator contains a vulnerability where input validation configurations (validation rules, error messages, etc.) may be modified.\r\nThis occurs when the following ActionForm (including its subclasses) are in the session scope.\r\n* ValidatorForm\r\n* ValidatorActionForm",
   link: "https://jvndb.jvn.jp/en/contents/2016/JVNDB-2016-000097.html",
   "sec:cpe": {
      "#text": "cpe:/a:apache:struts",
      "@product": "Apache Struts",
      "@vendor": "Apache Software Foundation",
      "@version": "2.2",
   },
   "sec:cvss": [
      {
         "@score": "5.8",
         "@severity": "Medium",
         "@type": "Base",
         "@vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:P",
         "@version": "2.0",
      },
      {
         "@score": "4.8",
         "@severity": "Medium",
         "@type": "Base",
         "@vector": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L",
         "@version": "3.0",
      },
   ],
   "sec:identifier": "JVNDB-2016-000097",
   "sec:references": [
      {
         "#text": "https://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN65044642/index.html",
         "@id": "JVN#65044642",
         "@source": "JVN",
      },
      {
         "#text": "https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-1182",
         "@id": "CVE-2016-1182",
         "@source": "CVE",
      },
      {
         "#text": "https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2016-1182",
         "@id": "CVE-2016-1182",
         "@source": "NVD",
      },
      {
         "#text": "https://github.com/kawasima/struts1-forever/commit/eda3a79907ed8fcb0387a0496d0cb14332f250e8",
         "@id": "Fixed CVE-2016-1181 and CVE-2016-1182",
         "@source": "Related document",
      },
      {
         "#text": "https://www.ipa.go.jp/en/security/vulnerabilities/cwe.html",
         "@id": "CWE-Other",
         "@title": "No Mapping(CWE-Other)",
      },
   ],
   title: "Apache Struts 1 vulnerable to input validation bypass",
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Security Advisory comment format.

This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.

UUIDv4 of the comment
UUIDv4 of the Vulnerability-Lookup instance
When the comment was created originally
When the comment was last updated
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
The identifier of the vulnerability (CVE ID, GHSA-ID, PYSEC ID, etc.).



Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.