jvndb-2024-006787
Vulnerability from jvndb
Published
2024-08-29 14:07
Modified
2024-08-29 14:07
Severity ?
Summary
xfpt vulnerable to stack-based buffer overflow
Details
xfpt fails to handle appropriately some parameters inside the input data, resulting in a stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability (CWE-121).
Yuhei Kawakoya of NTT Security Holdings Corporation reported this vulnerability to JPCERT/CC.
JPCERT/CC coordinated with the developer.
References
▼ | Type | URL |
---|---|---|
JVN | https://jvn.jp/en/vu/JVNVU96498690/index.html | |
CVE | https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43700 | |
Stack-based Buffer Overflow(CWE-121) | https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/121.html |
Impacted products
▼ | Vendor | Product |
---|---|---|
Philip Hazel | xfpt |
{ "@rdf:about": "https://jvndb.jvn.jp/en/contents/2024/JVNDB-2024-006787.html", "dc:date": "2024-08-29T14:07+09:00", "dcterms:issued": "2024-08-29T14:07+09:00", "dcterms:modified": "2024-08-29T14:07+09:00", "description": "xfpt fails to handle appropriately some parameters inside the input data, resulting in a stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability (CWE-121).\r\n\r\nYuhei Kawakoya of NTT Security Holdings Corporation reported this vulnerability to JPCERT/CC.\r\nJPCERT/CC coordinated with the developer.", "link": "https://jvndb.jvn.jp/en/contents/2024/JVNDB-2024-006787.html", "sec:cpe": { "#text": "cpe:/a:misc:philip_hazel_xfpt", "@product": "xfpt", "@vendor": "Philip Hazel", "@version": "2.2" }, "sec:cvss": { "@score": "7.0", "@severity": "High", "@type": "Base", "@vector": "CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "@version": "3.0" }, "sec:identifier": "JVNDB-2024-006787", "sec:references": [ { "#text": "https://jvn.jp/en/vu/JVNVU96498690/index.html", "@id": "JVNVU#96498690", "@source": "JVN" }, { "#text": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43700", "@id": "CVE-2024-43700", "@source": "CVE" }, { "#text": "https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/121.html", "@id": "CWE-121", "@title": "Stack-based Buffer Overflow(CWE-121)" } ], "title": "xfpt vulnerable to stack-based buffer overflow" }
Loading...
Loading...
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.