JVNDB-2025-000110

Vulnerability from jvndb - Published: 2025-11-25 17:17 - Updated:2025-11-25 17:17
Severity ?
Summary
Multiple vulnerabilities in Security Point (Windows) of MaLion
Details
Security Point (Windows) of MaLion provided by Intercom, Inc. contains multiple vulnerabilities listed below.
  • Incorrect default permissions (CWE-276) - CVE-2025-59485
  • Stack-based buffer overflow in processing HTTP headers (CWE-121) - CVE-2025-62691
  • Heap-based buffer overflow in processing Content-Length (CWE-122) - CVE-2025-64693
CVE-2025-59485 Ruslan Sayfiev of GMO Cybersecurity by Ierae, Inc. reported this vulnerability to IPA. JPCERT/CC coordinated with the developer under Information Security Early Warning Partnership. CVE-2025-62691, CVE-2025-64693 Denis Faiustov, and Ruslan Sayfiev of GMO Cybersecurity by Ierae, Inc. reported these vulnerabilities to JPCERT/CC. JPCERT/CC coordinated with the developer.
Show details on JVN DB website

{
  "@rdf:about": "https://jvndb.jvn.jp/en/contents/2025/JVNDB-2025-000110.html",
  "dc:date": "2025-11-25T17:17+09:00",
  "dcterms:issued": "2025-11-25T17:17+09:00",
  "dcterms:modified": "2025-11-25T17:17+09:00",
  "description": "Security Point (Windows) of MaLion provided by Intercom, Inc. contains multiple vulnerabilities listed below.\u003cul\u003e\u003cli\u003eIncorrect default permissions (CWE-276) - CVE-2025-59485\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eStack-based buffer overflow in processing HTTP headers (CWE-121) - CVE-2025-62691\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eHeap-based buffer overflow in processing Content-Length (CWE-122) - CVE-2025-64693\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ul\u003eCVE-2025-59485\r\nRuslan Sayfiev of GMO Cybersecurity by Ierae, Inc. reported this vulnerability to IPA.\r\nJPCERT/CC coordinated with the developer under Information Security Early Warning Partnership.\r\n\r\nCVE-2025-62691, CVE-2025-64693\r\nDenis Faiustov, and Ruslan Sayfiev of GMO Cybersecurity by Ierae, Inc. reported these vulnerabilities to JPCERT/CC.\r\nJPCERT/CC coordinated with the developer.",
  "link": "https://jvndb.jvn.jp/en/contents/2025/JVNDB-2025-000110.html",
  "sec:cpe": [
    {
      "#text": "cpe:/a:intercom:malioncloud",
      "@product": "Security Point (Windows) of MaLionCloud",
      "@vendor": "Intercom, Inc.",
      "@version": "2.2"
    },
    {
      "#text": "cpe:/a:intercom:security_point_windows_of_malion",
      "@product": "Security Point (Windows) of MaLion",
      "@vendor": "Intercom, Inc.",
      "@version": "2.2"
    }
  ],
  "sec:cvss": {
    "@score": "9.8",
    "@severity": "Critical",
    "@type": "Base",
    "@vector": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
    "@version": "3.0"
  },
  "sec:identifier": "JVNDB-2025-000110",
  "sec:references": [
    {
      "#text": "https://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN76298784/index.html",
      "@id": "JVN#76298784",
      "@source": "JVN"
    },
    {
      "#text": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-59485",
      "@id": "CVE-2025-59485",
      "@source": "CVE"
    },
    {
      "#text": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-62691",
      "@id": "CVE-2025-62691",
      "@source": "CVE"
    },
    {
      "#text": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-64693",
      "@id": "CVE-2025-64693",
      "@source": "CVE"
    },
    {
      "#text": "https://www.ipa.go.jp/en/security/vulnerabilities/cwe.html",
      "@id": "CWE-Other",
      "@title": "No Mapping(CWE-Other)"
    }
  ],
  "title": "Multiple vulnerabilities in Security Point (Windows) of MaLion"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…