GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

JVNDB-2026-000074

Vulnerability from jvndb - Published: 2026-05-14 07:16 - Updated:2026-05-14 07:16
Severity
Summary
WPS Office improper access restriction to its named pipe
Details
WPS Office provided by WPS SOFTWARE PTE. LTD. contains a service program running background and providing certain functionalities to the other programs. This service program uses a named pipe to communicate with the other programs. The named pipe above is not properly protected and any non-administrative user can access it.
  • Exposed dangerous method or function (CWE-749) - CVE-2018-6400
MASAHIRO IIDA of LAC Co., Ltd. reported this vulnerability to IPA. JPCERT/CC coordinated with the developer under Information Security Early Warning Partnership.
Show details on JVN DB website

{
  "@rdf:about": "https://jvndb.jvn.jp/en/contents/2026/JVNDB-2026-000074.html",
  "dc:date": "2026-05-14T16:16+09:00",
  "dcterms:issued": "2026-05-14T16:16+09:00",
  "dcterms:modified": "2026-05-14T16:16+09:00",
  "description": "WPS Office provided by WPS SOFTWARE PTE. LTD. contains a service program running background and providing certain functionalities to the other programs. This service program uses a named pipe to communicate with the other programs.\r\nThe named pipe above is not properly protected and any non-administrative user can access it.\u003ca href=\u0027https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/749.html\u0027 target=\u0027_blank\u0027\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\u003ca href=\u0027https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-6400\u0027 target=\u0027_blank\u0027\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\u003cul\u003e\u003cli\u003eExposed dangerous method or function (CWE-749) - CVE-2018-6400\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ul\u003eMASAHIRO IIDA of LAC Co., Ltd. reported this vulnerability to IPA.\r\nJPCERT/CC coordinated with the developer under Information Security Early Warning Partnership.",
  "link": "https://jvndb.jvn.jp/en/contents/2026/JVNDB-2026-000074.html",
  "sec:cpe": [
    {
      "#text": "cpe:/a:wps:kingsoft_pdf_pro",
      "@product": "KINGSOFT PDF Pro",
      "@vendor": "WPS",
      "@version": "2.2"
    },
    {
      "#text": "cpe:/a:wps:wps_cloud",
      "@product": "WPS Cloud",
      "@vendor": "WPS",
      "@version": "2.2"
    },
    {
      "#text": "cpe:/a:wps:wps_cloud_pro",
      "@product": "WPS Cloud Pro",
      "@vendor": "WPS",
      "@version": "2.2"
    },
    {
      "#text": "cpe:/a:wps:wps_office2",
      "@product": "WPS Office2",
      "@vendor": "WPS",
      "@version": "2.2"
    }
  ],
  "sec:cvss": {
    "@score": "7.8",
    "@severity": "High",
    "@type": "Base",
    "@vector": "CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
    "@version": "3.0"
  },
  "sec:identifier": "JVNDB-2026-000074",
  "sec:references": [
    {
      "#text": "https://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN14434132/index.html",
      "@id": "JVN#14434132",
      "@source": "JVN"
    },
    {
      "#text": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-6400",
      "@id": "CVE-2018-6400",
      "@source": "CVE"
    },
    {
      "#text": "https://www.ipa.go.jp/en/security/vulnerabilities/cwe.html",
      "@id": "CWE-Other",
      "@title": "No Mapping(CWE-Other)"
    }
  ],
  "title": "WPS Office improper access restriction to its named pipe"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…