mal-0000-ossf-package-analysis-c6ef1fa05f2ae34a
Vulnerability from ossf_malicious_packages
Published
2025-12-11 05:38
Modified
2025-12-11 05:38
Summary
Malicious code in @cheqplease/structured-logger (npm)
Details

The OpenSSF Package Analysis project identified '@cheqplease/structured-logger' @ 2.2.15 (npm) as malicious.

It is considered malicious because:

  • The package communicates with a domain associated with malicious activity.

  • The package executes one or more commands associated with malicious behavior.


{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "@cheqplease/structured-logger"
      },
      "versions": [
        "2.2.15"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "credits": [
    {
      "contact": [
        "https://github.com/ossf/package-analysis",
        "https://openssf.slack.com/channels/package_analysis"
      ],
      "name": "OpenSSF: Package Analysis",
      "type": "FINDER"
    }
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "malicious-packages-origins": [
      {
        "import_time": "2025-12-11T05:40:36.005022054Z",
        "modified_time": "2025-12-11T05:38:58Z",
        "sha256": "c6ef1fa05f2ae34a0acbddf00e8be9c566e82f3398f990ca95eeceb8dec8e82d",
        "source": "ossf-package-analysis",
        "versions": [
          "2.2.15"
        ]
      }
    ]
  },
  "details": "The OpenSSF Package Analysis project identified \u0027@cheqplease/structured-logger\u0027 @ 2.2.15 (npm) as malicious.\n\nIt is considered malicious because:\n\n- The package communicates with a domain associated with malicious activity.\n\n- The package executes one or more commands associated with malicious behavior.\n",
  "id": "",
  "modified": "2025-12-11T05:38:58Z",
  "published": "2025-12-11T05:38:58Z",
  "schema_version": "1.7.4",
  "summary": "Malicious code in @cheqplease/structured-logger (npm)"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…