mal-2025-192958
Vulnerability from ossf_malicious_packages
Published
2025-12-29 10:04
Modified
2025-12-29 10:08
Summary
Malicious code in smtmlib (PyPI)
Details

-= Per source details. Do not edit below this line.=-

Source: kam193 (e871336d0effe99cb62efeda3a287186e75c1bd4ca5770efd81718db8ababe4e)

Malicious copy of a standard library module that during class initialization downloads and executes remote code and after that attempts to cover its tracks by overwriting itself with non-malicious code. The remote code aims to collect and exfiltrate sensitive Telegram session files.

This campaign shares infrastructure and basic methods with previous 2025-11-uzip campaign.


Category: MALICIOUS - The campaign has clearly malicious intent, like infostealers.

Campaign: 2025-12-smtblib

Reasons (based on the campaign):

  • Downloads and executes a remote malicious script.

  • infostealer

  • target:telegram

  • exfiltration-credentials

  • action-hidden-in-lib-usage

  • covering-tracks

  • clones-real-package

  • typosquatting

Credits

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "smtmlib"
      },
      "versions": [
        "0.1.6",
        "0.1.7"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "credits": [
    {
      "contact": [
        "https://github.com/kam193",
        "https://bad-packages.kam193.eu/"
      ],
      "name": "Kamil Ma\u0144kowski (kam193)",
      "type": "REPORTER"
    }
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "iocs": {
      "ips": [
        "87.120.107.132"
      ],
      "urls": [
        "http://87.120.107.132:3301/reactor",
        "http://87.120.107.132:1488/drill",
        "http://87.120.107.132:1488/drip",
        "http://87.120.107.132:1488/key"
      ]
    },
    "malicious-packages-origins": [
      {
        "id": "pypi/2025-12-smtblib/smtmlib",
        "import_time": "2025-12-29T11:07:13.547036865Z",
        "modified_time": "2025-12-29T10:08:51.60566Z",
        "sha256": "e871336d0effe99cb62efeda3a287186e75c1bd4ca5770efd81718db8ababe4e",
        "source": "kam193",
        "versions": [
          "0.1.6",
          "0.1.7"
        ]
      }
    ]
  },
  "details": "\n---\n_-= Per source details. Do not edit below this line.=-_\n\n## Source: kam193 (e871336d0effe99cb62efeda3a287186e75c1bd4ca5770efd81718db8ababe4e)\nMalicious copy of a standard library module that during class initialization downloads and executes remote code and after that attempts to cover its tracks by overwriting itself with non-malicious code. The remote code aims to collect and exfiltrate sensitive Telegram session files.\n\nThis campaign shares infrastructure and basic methods with previous 2025-11-uzip campaign.\n\n\n---\n\nCategory: MALICIOUS - The campaign has clearly malicious intent, like infostealers.\n\n\nCampaign: 2025-12-smtblib\n\n\nReasons (based on the campaign):\n\n\n - Downloads and executes a remote malicious script.\n\n\n - infostealer\n\n\n - target:telegram\n\n\n - exfiltration-credentials\n\n\n - action-hidden-in-lib-usage\n\n\n - covering-tracks\n\n\n - clones-real-package\n\n\n - typosquatting\n",
  "id": "MAL-2025-192958",
  "modified": "2025-12-29T10:08:51Z",
  "published": "2025-12-29T10:04:23Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bad-packages.kam193.eu/pypi/package/smtmlib"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.7.4",
  "summary": "Malicious code in smtmlib (PyPI)"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…