mal-2025-192962
Vulnerability from ossf_malicious_packages
Published
2025-12-30 09:52
Modified
2025-12-30 10:09
Summary
Malicious code in rippling-cli (PyPI)
Details

-= Per source details. Do not edit below this line.=-

Source: kam193 (bac12bb851f49ac4801addcf6964c854abe90430140d3e75e4eefcd4c7cf1bf0)

Installing the package or importing the module exfiltrates basic information about the host, and the package has no other purpose.


Category: PROBABLY_PENTEST - Packages looking like typical pentest packages, but also anything that looks like testing, exploring pre-prepared kits, research & co, with clearly low-harm possibilities.

Campaign: GENERIC-standard-pypi-install-pentest

Reasons (based on the campaign):

  • The package contains code to exfiltrate basic data from the system, like IP or username. It has a limited risk.

  • The package overrides the install command in setup.py to execute malicious code during installation.

Source: ossf-package-analysis (8f975a6daba7e79d8fc482ce44aecafe9201c64358c7fb60a074a5e3a7e76dde)

The OpenSSF Package Analysis project identified 'rippling-cli' @ 1.0.1 (pypi) as malicious.

It is considered malicious because:

  • The package communicates with a domain associated with malicious activity.

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "rippling-cli"
      },
      "versions": [
        "2.0.2",
        "1.0.1"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "credits": [
    {
      "contact": [
        "https://github.com/kam193",
        "https://bad-packages.kam193.eu/"
      ],
      "name": "Kamil Ma\u0144kowski (kam193)",
      "type": "REPORTER"
    },
    {
      "contact": [
        "https://github.com/ossf/package-analysis",
        "https://openssf.slack.com/channels/package_analysis"
      ],
      "name": "OpenSSF: Package Analysis",
      "type": "FINDER"
    }
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "malicious-packages-origins": [
      {
        "id": "pypi/GENERIC-standard-pypi-install-pentest/rippling-cli",
        "import_time": "2025-12-30T10:08:12.317033999Z",
        "modified_time": "2025-12-30T10:00:53.439008Z",
        "sha256": "bac12bb851f49ac4801addcf6964c854abe90430140d3e75e4eefcd4c7cf1bf0",
        "source": "kam193",
        "versions": [
          "2.0.2",
          "1.0.1",
          "2.0.2"
        ]
      },
      {
        "import_time": "2025-12-30T10:07:41.553449824Z",
        "modified_time": "2025-12-30T09:52:01Z",
        "sha256": "8f975a6daba7e79d8fc482ce44aecafe9201c64358c7fb60a074a5e3a7e76dde",
        "source": "ossf-package-analysis",
        "versions": [
          "1.0.1"
        ]
      }
    ]
  },
  "details": "\n---\n_-= Per source details. Do not edit below this line.=-_\n\n## Source: kam193 (bac12bb851f49ac4801addcf6964c854abe90430140d3e75e4eefcd4c7cf1bf0)\nInstalling the package or importing the module exfiltrates basic information about the host, and the package has no other purpose.\n\n\n---\n\nCategory: PROBABLY_PENTEST - Packages looking like typical pentest packages, but also anything that looks like testing, exploring pre-prepared kits, research \u0026 co, with clearly low-harm possibilities.\n\n\nCampaign: GENERIC-standard-pypi-install-pentest\n\n\nReasons (based on the campaign):\n\n\n - The package contains code to exfiltrate basic data from the system, like IP or username. It has a limited risk.\n\n\n - The package overrides the install command in setup.py to execute malicious code during installation.\n\n## Source: ossf-package-analysis (8f975a6daba7e79d8fc482ce44aecafe9201c64358c7fb60a074a5e3a7e76dde)\nThe OpenSSF Package Analysis project identified \u0027rippling-cli\u0027 @ 1.0.1 (pypi) as malicious.\n\nIt is considered malicious because:\n\n- The package communicates with a domain associated with malicious activity.\n",
  "id": "MAL-2025-192962",
  "modified": "2025-12-30T10:09:50Z",
  "published": "2025-12-30T09:52:01Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bad-packages.kam193.eu/pypi/package/rippling-cli"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.7.4",
  "summary": "Malicious code in rippling-cli (PyPI)"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…