mal-2026-3028
Vulnerability from ossf_malicious_packages
Published
2026-04-24 05:40
Modified
2026-04-24 05:40
Summary
Malicious code in amplitude-ma-ts (npm)
Details
npm stealer. Hardcoded Discord webhook id 1497047226428690432 in postinstall Folder/bin/S.js. Exfils {hostname, whoami, pwd, public_ip (api.ipify.org), /etc/hosts} via Discord embed. v1.0.21 empty placeholder, v1.0.22 shipped payload — name-squat-then-poison. Typosquats @amplitude/* analytics scope. Maintainer 4senna bugbounty4senna+1@gmail.com (Gmail plus-alias throwaway). Score 20, signals: install_hook + nodejs_phone_home + iplookup_website + discord_bot + discord_exfil + exfil_whoami_hostname. Report: data/reports/research-threat-analysis/reports/2026-04-24-amplitude-ma-ts.md
Credits
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "amplitude-ma-ts"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"contact": [
"https://safedep.io"
],
"name": "SafeDep",
"type": "FINDER"
}
],
"database_specific": {
"malicious-packages-origins": null
},
"details": "npm stealer. Hardcoded Discord webhook id 1497047226428690432 in postinstall Folder/bin/S.js. Exfils {hostname, whoami, pwd, public_ip (api.ipify.org), /etc/hosts} via Discord embed. v1.0.21 empty placeholder, v1.0.22 shipped payload \u2014 name-squat-then-poison. Typosquats @amplitude/* analytics scope. Maintainer 4senna \u003cbugbounty4senna+1@gmail.com\u003e (Gmail plus-alias throwaway). Score 20, signals: install_hook + nodejs_phone_home + iplookup_website + discord_bot + discord_exfil + exfil_whoami_hostname. Report: data/reports/research-threat-analysis/reports/2026-04-24-amplitude-ma-ts.md",
"id": "MAL-2026-3028",
"modified": "2026-04-24T05:40:43Z",
"published": "2026-04-24T05:40:43Z",
"schema_version": "1.7.4",
"summary": "Malicious code in amplitude-ma-ts (npm)"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…