mal-2026-610
Vulnerability from ossf_malicious_packages
Published
2026-01-30 19:09
Modified
2026-01-30 19:09
Summary
Malicious code in snapshot-date (PyPI)
Details

-= Per source details. Do not edit below this line.=-

Source: kam193 (8e86008d35e5f11e68c465940563127cdc9ba1d4b2963f092914bf8e9ce2587b)

This campaign is built from two parts: 1) packages named like time-check-server, snapshot-photo contain an innocent-looking code that sends "date" to a remote server, 2) packages named like alicloud-client are clones of legit aliyun-python-sdk-core package, with a small change in the client.py code, where it imports the time-check-server and calls it, but instead of a date, the credentials to the cloud are exfiltrated. There are also variations with AWS clients

Apparently, the campaign started at least 2 years ago with the snapshot-photo package containing the same functionality as the newer time-check-server (see https://github.com/pypi-data/pypi-mirror-238/blob/code/packages/snapshot-photo/snapshot_photo-0.0.3-py3-none-any.whl/snapshot_photo/date_format.py).


Category: MALICIOUS - The campaign has clearly malicious intent, like infostealers.

Campaign: 2025-02-alicloud-client

Reasons (based on the campaign):

  • clones-real-package

  • action-hidden-in-lib-usage

  • The malicious code is intentionally included in a dependency of the package

  • exfiltration-cloud-tokens

Credits

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "snapshot-date"
      },
      "versions": [
        "1.0.0",
        "1.0.1",
        "1.0.2",
        "1.0.3"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "credits": [
    {
      "contact": [
        "https://github.com/kam193",
        "https://bad-packages.kam193.eu/"
      ],
      "name": "Kamil Ma\u0144kowski (kam193)",
      "type": "REPORTER"
    }
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "iocs": {
      "domains": [
        "checktimeserver.org",
        "aliyun-sdk-requests.xyz",
        "api.jumpservercdn.com",
        "jumpservercdn.com"
      ],
      "urls": [
        "https://api.checktimeserver.org/",
        "https://api.aliyun-sdk-requests.xyz/"
      ]
    },
    "malicious-packages-origins": [
      {
        "id": "pypi/2025-02-alicloud-client/snapshot-date",
        "import_time": "2026-01-30T19:43:58.384035858Z",
        "modified_time": "2026-01-30T19:09:41.017554Z",
        "sha256": "8e86008d35e5f11e68c465940563127cdc9ba1d4b2963f092914bf8e9ce2587b",
        "source": "kam193",
        "versions": [
          "1.0.0",
          "1.0.1",
          "1.0.2",
          "1.0.3"
        ]
      }
    ]
  },
  "details": "\n---\n_-= Per source details. Do not edit below this line.=-_\n\n## Source: kam193 (8e86008d35e5f11e68c465940563127cdc9ba1d4b2963f092914bf8e9ce2587b)\nThis campaign is built from two parts:\n1) packages named like time-check-server, snapshot-photo contain an innocent-looking code that sends \"date\" to a remote server,\n2) packages named like alicloud-client are clones of legit aliyun-python-sdk-core package, with a small change in the client.py code, where it imports the time-check-server and calls it, but instead of a date, the credentials to the cloud are exfiltrated. There are also variations with AWS clients\n\nApparently, the campaign started at least 2 years ago with the snapshot-photo package containing the same functionality as the newer time-check-server (see https://github.com/pypi-data/pypi-mirror-238/blob/code/packages/snapshot-photo/snapshot_photo-0.0.3-py3-none-any.whl/snapshot_photo/date_format.py).\n\n\n---\n\nCategory: MALICIOUS - The campaign has clearly malicious intent, like infostealers.\n\n\nCampaign: 2025-02-alicloud-client\n\n\nReasons (based on the campaign):\n\n\n - clones-real-package\n\n\n - action-hidden-in-lib-usage\n\n\n - The malicious code is intentionally included in a dependency of the package\n\n\n - exfiltration-cloud-tokens\n",
  "id": "MAL-2026-610",
  "modified": "2026-01-30T19:09:41Z",
  "published": "2026-01-30T19:09:41Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/pypi-data/pypi-mirror-238/blob/code/packages/snapshot-photo/snapshot_photo-0.0.3-py3-none-any.whl/snapshot_photo/date_format.py"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://x.com/ReversingLabs/status/1900198602242204003"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://thehackernews.com/2025/03/malicious-pypi-packages-stole-cloud.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bad-packages.kam193.eu/pypi/package/snapshot-date"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.7.4",
  "summary": "Malicious code in snapshot-date (PyPI)"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…