MSRC_CVE-2019-16254

Vulnerability from csaf_microsoft - Published: 2019-11-02 00:00 - Updated: 2020-09-25 00:00
Summary
Ruby through 2.4.7 2.5.x through 2.5.6 and 2.6.x through 2.6.4 allows HTTP Response Splitting. If a program using WEBrick inserts untrusted input into the response header an attacker can exploit it to insert a newline character to split a header and inject malicious content to deceive clients. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2017-17742 which addressed the CRLF vector but did not address an isolated CR or an isolated LF.

Notes

Additional Resources
To determine the support lifecycle for your software, see the Microsoft Support Lifecycle: https://support.microsoft.com/lifecycle
Disclaimer
The information provided in the Microsoft Knowledge Base is provided \"as is\" without warranty of any kind. Microsoft disclaims all warranties, either express or implied, including the warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose. In no event shall Microsoft Corporation or its suppliers be liable for any damages whatsoever including direct, indirect, incidental, consequential, loss of business profits or special damages, even if Microsoft Corporation or its suppliers have been advised of the possibility of such damages. Some states do not allow the exclusion or limitation of liability for consequential or incidental damages so the foregoing limitation may not apply.
To clipboard 

{
  "document": {
    "category": "csaf_vex",
    "csaf_version": "2.0",
    "distribution": {
      "text": "Public",
      "tlp": {
        "label": "WHITE",
        "url": "https://www.first.org/tlp/"
      }
    },
    "lang": "en-US",
    "notes": [
      {
        "category": "general",
        "text": "To determine the support lifecycle for your software, see the Microsoft Support Lifecycle: https://support.microsoft.com/lifecycle",
        "title": "Additional Resources"
      },
      {
        "category": "legal_disclaimer",
        "text": "The information provided in the Microsoft Knowledge Base is provided \\\"as is\\\" without warranty of any kind. Microsoft disclaims all warranties, either express or implied, including the warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose. In no event shall Microsoft Corporation or its suppliers be liable for any damages whatsoever including direct, indirect, incidental, consequential, loss of business profits or special damages, even if Microsoft Corporation or its suppliers have been advised of the possibility of such damages. Some states do not allow the exclusion or limitation of liability for consequential or incidental damages so the foregoing limitation may not apply.",
        "title": "Disclaimer"
      }
    ],
    "publisher": {
      "category": "vendor",
      "contact_details": "secure@microsoft.com",
      "name": "Microsoft Security Response Center",
      "namespace": "https://msrc.microsoft.com"
    },
    "references": [
      {
        "category": "self",
        "summary": "CVE-2019-16254 Ruby through 2.4.7 2.5.x through 2.5.6 and 2.6.x through 2.6.4 allows HTTP Response Splitting. If a program using WEBrick inserts untrusted input into the response header an attacker can exploit it to insert a newline character to split a header and inject malicious content to deceive clients. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2017-17742 which addressed the CRLF vector but did not address an isolated CR or an isolated LF. - VEX",
        "url": "https://msrc.microsoft.com/csaf/vex/2019/msrc_cve-2019-16254.json"
      },
      {
        "category": "external",
        "summary": "Microsoft Support Lifecycle",
        "url": "https://support.microsoft.com/lifecycle"
      },
      {
        "category": "external",
        "summary": "Common Vulnerability Scoring System",
        "url": "https://www.first.org/cvss"
      }
    ],
    "title": "Ruby through 2.4.7 2.5.x through 2.5.6 and 2.6.x through 2.6.4 allows HTTP Response Splitting. If a program using WEBrick inserts untrusted input into the response header an attacker can exploit it to insert a newline character to split a header and inject malicious content to deceive clients. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2017-17742 which addressed the CRLF vector but did not address an isolated CR or an isolated LF.",
    "tracking": {
      "current_release_date": "2020-09-25T00:00:00.000Z",
      "generator": {
        "date": "2025-10-19T17:46:18.335Z",
        "engine": {
          "name": "MSRC Generator",
          "version": "1.0"
        }
      },
      "id": "msrc_CVE-2019-16254",
      "initial_release_date": "2019-11-02T00:00:00.000Z",
      "revision_history": [
        {
          "date": "2020-09-25T00:00:00.000Z",
          "legacy_version": "1",
          "number": "1",
          "summary": "Information published."
        }
      ],
      "status": "final",
      "version": "1"
    }
  },
  "product_tree": {
    "branches": [
      {
        "branches": [
          {
            "branches": [
              {
                "category": "product_version",
                "name": "1.0",
                "product": {
                  "name": "CBL Mariner 1.0",
                  "product_id": "16820"
                }
              }
            ],
            "category": "product_name",
            "name": "Azure Linux"
          },
          {
            "branches": [
              {
                "category": "product_version_range",
                "name": "\u003ccm1 ruby 2.6.7-1",
                "product": {
                  "name": "\u003ccm1 ruby 2.6.7-1",
                  "product_id": "1"
                }
              },
              {
                "category": "product_version",
                "name": "cm1 ruby 2.6.7-1",
                "product": {
                  "name": "cm1 ruby 2.6.7-1",
                  "product_id": "17016"
                }
              }
            ],
            "category": "product_name",
            "name": "ruby"
          }
        ],
        "category": "vendor",
        "name": "Microsoft"
      }
    ],
    "relationships": [
      {
        "category": "default_component_of",
        "full_product_name": {
          "name": "\u003ccm1 ruby 2.6.7-1 as a component of CBL Mariner 1.0",
          "product_id": "16820-1"
        },
        "product_reference": "1",
        "relates_to_product_reference": "16820"
      },
      {
        "category": "default_component_of",
        "full_product_name": {
          "name": "cm1 ruby 2.6.7-1 as a component of CBL Mariner 1.0",
          "product_id": "17016-16820"
        },
        "product_reference": "17016",
        "relates_to_product_reference": "16820"
      }
    ]
  },
  "vulnerabilities": [
    {
      "cve": "CVE-2019-16254",
      "cwe": {
        "id": "CWE-74",
        "name": "Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component (\u0027Injection\u0027)"
      },
      "notes": [
        {
          "category": "general",
          "text": "mitre",
          "title": "Assigning CNA"
        }
      ],
      "product_status": {
        "fixed": [
          "17016-16820"
        ],
        "known_affected": [
          "16820-1"
        ]
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "category": "self",
          "summary": "CVE-2019-16254 Ruby through 2.4.7 2.5.x through 2.5.6 and 2.6.x through 2.6.4 allows HTTP Response Splitting. If a program using WEBrick inserts untrusted input into the response header an attacker can exploit it to insert a newline character to split a header and inject malicious content to deceive clients. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2017-17742 which addressed the CRLF vector but did not address an isolated CR or an isolated LF. - VEX",
          "url": "https://msrc.microsoft.com/csaf/vex/2019/msrc_cve-2019-16254.json"
        }
      ],
      "remediations": [
        {
          "category": "vendor_fix",
          "date": "2020-09-25T00:00:00.000Z",
          "details": "2.6.7-1:Security Update:https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/azure-linux/tutorial-azure-linux-upgrade",
          "product_ids": [
            "16820-1"
          ],
          "url": "https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/azure-linux/tutorial-azure-linux-upgrade"
        }
      ],
      "scores": [
        {
          "cvss_v3": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 5.3,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "environmentalsScore": 0.0,
            "integrityImpact": "LOW",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "temporalScore": 5.3,
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
            "version": "3.1"
          },
          "products": [
            "16820-1"
          ]
        }
      ],
      "title": "Ruby through 2.4.7 2.5.x through 2.5.6 and 2.6.x through 2.6.4 allows HTTP Response Splitting. If a program using WEBrick inserts untrusted input into the response header an attacker can exploit it to insert a newline character to split a header and inject malicious content to deceive clients. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2017-17742 which addressed the CRLF vector but did not address an isolated CR or an isolated LF."
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.