pysec-2008-14
Vulnerability from pysec
Published
2008-03-20 00:44
Modified
2024-11-25 18:35
Details

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Plone CMS 3.0.5 and 3.0.6 allow remote attackers to (1) add arbitrary accounts via the join_form page and (2) change the privileges of arbitrary groups via the prefs_groups_overview page.

Aliases



{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "Plone"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "3.1"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2008-0164"
  ],
  "details": "Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Plone CMS 3.0.5 and 3.0.6 allow remote attackers to (1) add arbitrary accounts via the join_form page and (2) change the privileges of arbitrary groups via the prefs_groups_overview page.",
  "id": "PYSEC-2008-14",
  "modified": "2024-11-25T18:35:18.357593Z",
  "published": "2008-03-20T00:44:00Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "http://plone.org/about/security/advisories/cve-2008-0164"
    },
    {
      "type": "EVIDENCE",
      "url": "http://www.procheckup.com/Hacking_Plone_CMS.pdf"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/29361"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://securityreason.com/securityalert/3754"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/41263"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/489544/100/0/threaded"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.