PYSEC-2009-3
Vulnerability from pysec - Published: 2009-08-04 16:30 - Updated: 2021-07-15 02:22The Admin media handler in core/servers/basehttp.py in Django 1.0 and 0.96 does not properly map URL requests to expected "static media files," which allows remote attackers to conduct directory traversal attacks and read arbitrary files via a crafted URL.
| Name | purl | django | pkg:pypi/django |
|---|
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "django",
"purl": "pkg:pypi/django"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"versions": [
"1.0.1",
"1.0.2",
"1.0.3",
"1.0.4"
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2009-2659",
"GHSA-9xg7-gg9m-rmq9"
],
"details": "The Admin media handler in core/servers/basehttp.py in Django 1.0 and 0.96 does not properly map URL requests to expected \"static media files,\" which allows remote attackers to conduct directory traversal attacks and read arbitrary files via a crafted URL.",
"id": "PYSEC-2009-3",
"modified": "2021-07-15T02:22:07.875702Z",
"published": "2009-08-04T16:30:00Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/35859"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://code.djangoproject.com/changeset/11353"
},
{
"type": "ARTICLE",
"url": "http://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2009/jul/28/security/"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2009/07/29/2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=539134"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/36137"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/36153"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2009-August/msg00055.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2009-August/msg00069.html"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-9xg7-gg9m-rmq9"
}
]
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.