PYSEC-2010-26

Vulnerability from pysec - Published: 2010-07-02 19:30 - Updated: 2021-07-16 01:31
VLAI?
Details

Dan Pascu python-cjson 1.0.5 does not properly handle a ['/'] argument to cjson.encode, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct certain cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks involving Firefox and the end tag of a SCRIPT element.

Impacted products
Name purl
python-cjson pkg:pypi/python-cjson

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "python-cjson",
        "purl": "pkg:pypi/python-cjson"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "1.1.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ],
      "versions": [
        "1.0.0",
        "1.0.1",
        "1.0.2",
        "1.0.3",
        "1.0.4",
        "1.0.5"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2009-4924",
    "GHSA-95jp-77w6-qj52"
  ],
  "details": "Dan Pascu python-cjson 1.0.5 does not properly handle a [\u0027/\u0027] argument to cjson.encode, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct certain cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks involving Firefox and the end tag of a SCRIPT element.",
  "id": "PYSEC-2010-26",
  "modified": "2021-07-16T01:31:29.455845Z",
  "published": "2010-07-02T19:30:00Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ARTICLE",
      "url": "http://t3.dotgnu.info/blog/insecurity/quotes-dont-help.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://pypi.python.org/pypi/python-cjson/"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-95jp-77w6-qj52"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…