PYSEC-2011-2
Vulnerability from pysec - Published: 2011-10-19 10:55 - Updated: 2021-07-05 00:01
VLAI?
Details
The verify_exists functionality in the URLField implementation in Django before 1.2.7 and 1.3.x before 1.3.1 relies on Python libraries that attempt access to an arbitrary URL with no timeout, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (resource consumption) via a URL associated with (1) a slow response, (2) a completed TCP connection with no application data sent, or (3) a large amount of application data, a related issue to CVE-2011-1521.
Impacted products
| Name | purl | django | pkg:pypi/django |
|---|
Aliases
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "django",
"purl": "pkg:pypi/django"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.2.7"
},
{
"introduced": "1.3"
},
{
"fixed": "1.3.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"versions": [
"1.0.1",
"1.0.2",
"1.0.3",
"1.0.4",
"1.1",
"1.1.1",
"1.1.2",
"1.1.3",
"1.1.4",
"1.2",
"1.2.1",
"1.2.2",
"1.2.3",
"1.2.4",
"1.2.5",
"1.2.6",
"1.3"
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2011-4137",
"GHSA-3jqw-crqj-w8qw"
],
"details": "The verify_exists functionality in the URLField implementation in Django before 1.2.7 and 1.3.x before 1.3.1 relies on Python libraries that attempt access to an arbitrary URL with no timeout, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (resource consumption) via a URL associated with (1) a slow response, (2) a completed TCP connection with no application data sent, or (3) a large amount of application data, a related issue to CVE-2011-1521.",
"id": "PYSEC-2011-2",
"modified": "2021-07-05T00:01:17.875375Z",
"published": "2011-10-19T10:55:00Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737366"
},
{
"type": "ARTICLE",
"url": "https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2011/sep/10/127/"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/09/13/2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/09/15/5"
},
{
"type": "ARTICLE",
"url": "https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2011/sep/09/"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/09/11/1"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/46614"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2011/dsa-2332"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://hermes.opensuse.org/messages/14700881"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-3jqw-crqj-w8qw"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…