PYSEC-2013-25
Vulnerability from pysec - Published: 2013-08-23 16:55 - Updated: 2021-07-25 23:34
VLAI?
Details
The Python client in Apache Qpid before 2.2 does not verify that the server hostname matches a domain name in the subject's Common Name (CN) or subjectAltName field of the X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via an arbitrary valid certificate.
Impacted products
| Name | purl | qpid-python | pkg:pypi/qpid-python |
|---|
Aliases
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "qpid-python",
"purl": "pkg:pypi/qpid-python"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.22"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"versions": [
"0.20"
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2013-1909"
],
"details": "The Python client in Apache Qpid before 2.2 does not verify that the server hostname matches a domain name in the subject\u0027s Common Name (CN) or subjectAltName field of the X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via an arbitrary valid certificate.",
"id": "PYSEC-2013-25",
"modified": "2021-07-25T23:34:52.564224Z",
"published": "2013-08-23T16:55:00Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4918"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://qpid.apache.org/releases/qpid-0.22/release-notes.html"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/54137"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/53968"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-1024.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision\u0026revision=1460013"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…