PYSEC-2014-94
Vulnerability from pysec - Published: 2014-05-05 17:06 - Updated: 2021-08-27 03:22
VLAI?
Details
PyWBEM 0.7 and earlier does not verify that the server hostname matches a domain name in the subject's Common Name (CN) or subjectAltName field of the X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via an arbitrary valid certificate.
Impacted products
| Name | purl | pywbem | pkg:pypi/pywbem |
|---|
Aliases
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "pywbem",
"purl": "pkg:pypi/pywbem"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.8.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"versions": [
"0.7.0"
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2013-6444"
],
"details": "PyWBEM 0.7 and earlier does not verify that the server hostname matches a domain name in the subject\u0027s Common Name (CN) or subjectAltName field of the X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via an arbitrary valid certificate.",
"id": "PYSEC-2014-94",
"modified": "2021-08-27T03:22:18.708966Z",
"published": "2014-05-05T17:06:00Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1044246"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2013/q4/524"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://sourceforge.net/p/pywbem/mailman/message/31757312/"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://sourceforge.net/p/pywbem/code/627/"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/bulletinapr2016-2952098.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/64544"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…