pysec-2015-1
Vulnerability from pysec
Published
2015-08-12 14:59
Modified
2021-07-02 02:41
Details
Ansible before 1.9.2 does not verify that the server hostname matches a domain name in the subject's Common Name (CN) or subjectAltName field of the X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via an arbitrary valid certificate.
Aliases
{ "affected": [ { "package": { "ecosystem": "PyPI", "name": "ansible", "purl": "pkg:pypi/ansible" }, "ranges": [ { "events": [ { "introduced": "0" }, { "fixed": "1.9.2" } ], "type": "ECOSYSTEM" } ], "versions": [ "1.0", "1.1", "1.2", "1.2.1", "1.2.2", "1.2.3", "1.3.0", "1.3.1", "1.3.2", "1.3.3", "1.3.4", "1.4", "1.4.1", "1.4.2", "1.4.3", "1.4.4", "1.4.5", "1.5", "1.5.1", "1.5.2", "1.5.3", "1.5.4", "1.5.5", "1.6", "1.6.1", "1.6.10", "1.6.2", "1.6.3", "1.6.4", "1.6.5", "1.6.6", "1.6.7", "1.6.8", "1.6.9", "1.7", "1.7.1", "1.7.2", "1.8", "1.8.1", "1.8.2", "1.8.3", "1.8.4", "1.9.0", "1.9.0.1", "1.9.1" ] } ], "aliases": [ "CVE-2015-3908", "GHSA-w64c-pxjj-h866" ], "details": "Ansible before 1.9.2 does not verify that the server hostname matches a domain name in the subject\u0027s Common Name (CN) or subjectAltName field of the X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via an arbitrary valid certificate.", "id": "PYSEC-2015-1", "modified": "2021-07-02T02:41:33.423322Z", "published": "2015-08-12T14:59:00Z", "references": [ { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2015-07/msg00051.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/07/14/4" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.ansible.com/security" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2015-08/msg00029.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/09/msg00016.html" }, { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-w64c-pxjj-h866" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.