PYSEC-2015-36
Vulnerability from pysec - Published: 2015-01-02 20:59 - Updated: 2024-11-21 14:22
VLAI?
Details
Buffer overflow in the RiffVideo::infoTagsHandler function in riffvideo.cpp in Exiv2 0.24 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a long IKEY INFO tag value in an AVI file.
Impacted products
| Name | purl | exiv2 | pkg:pypi/exiv2 |
|---|
Aliases
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "exiv2",
"purl": "pkg:pypi/exiv2"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"versions": [
"0.1",
"0.11.0",
"0.11.1",
"0.11.2",
"0.11.3",
"0.12.0",
"0.12.1",
"0.13.0",
"0.13.1",
"0.13.2",
"0.14.0",
"0.14.1",
"0.15.0",
"0.16.0",
"0.16.1",
"0.16.2",
"0.16.2.post1",
"0.16.3",
"0.16.3.post1",
"0.17.0",
"0.17.1",
"0.2",
"0.3",
"0.3.1"
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2014-9449"
],
"details": "Buffer overflow in the RiffVideo::infoTagsHandler function in riffvideo.cpp in Exiv2 0.24 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a long IKEY INFO tag value in an AVI file.",
"id": "PYSEC-2015-36",
"modified": "2024-11-21T14:22:45.931449Z",
"published": "2015-01-02T20:59:00Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "http://dev.exiv2.org/issues/960"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "http://dev.exiv2.org/issues/960"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/61801"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "http://dev.exiv2.org/projects/exiv2/repository/diff?rev=3264\u0026rev_to=3263"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-January/148382.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/71912"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201507-03"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2454-1"
}
],
"withdrawn": "2024-11-22T04:37:03Z"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…