PYSEC-2016-24
Vulnerability from pysec - Published: 2016-12-16 09:59 - Updated: 2021-08-27 03:21
VLAI?
Details
redirect() in bottle.py in bottle 0.12.10 doesn't filter a "\r\n" sequence, which leads to a CRLF attack, as demonstrated by a redirect("233\r\nSet-Cookie: name=salt") call.
Impacted products
| Name | purl | bottle | pkg:pypi/bottle |
|---|
Aliases
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "bottle",
"purl": "pkg:pypi/bottle"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "6d7e13da0f998820800ecb3fe9ccee4189aefb54"
}
],
"repo": "https://github.com/bottlepy/bottle",
"type": "GIT"
},
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0.10.1"
},
{
"fixed": "0.12.11"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"versions": [
"0.10.1",
"0.10.10",
"0.10.11",
"0.10.12",
"0.10.2",
"0.10.3",
"0.10.4",
"0.10.5",
"0.10.6",
"0.10.7",
"0.10.8",
"0.10.9",
"0.11.1",
"0.11.2",
"0.11.3",
"0.11.4",
"0.11.5",
"0.11.6",
"0.11.7",
"0.12.1",
"0.12.10",
"0.12.2",
"0.12.3",
"0.12.4",
"0.12.5",
"0.12.6",
"0.12.7",
"0.12.8",
"0.12.9"
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2016-9964",
"GHSA-j6f7-hghw-g437"
],
"details": "redirect() in bottle.py in bottle 0.12.10 doesn\u0027t filter a \"\\r\\n\" sequence, which leads to a CRLF attack, as demonstrated by a redirect(\"233\\r\\nSet-Cookie: name=salt\") call.",
"id": "PYSEC-2016-24",
"modified": "2021-08-27T03:21:56.402931Z",
"published": "2016-12-16T09:59:00Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://github.com/bottlepy/bottle/issues/913"
},
{
"type": "FIX",
"url": "https://github.com/bottlepy/bottle/commit/6d7e13da0f998820800ecb3fe9ccee4189aefb54"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/94961"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3743"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-j6f7-hghw-g437"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…