pysec-2016-24
Vulnerability from pysec
Published
2016-12-16 09:59
Modified
2021-08-27 03:21
Details

redirect() in bottle.py in bottle 0.12.10 doesn't filter a "\r\n" sequence, which leads to a CRLF attack, as demonstrated by a redirect("233\r\nSet-Cookie: name=salt") call.

Impacted products
Name purl
bottle pkg:pypi/bottle
Aliases


To clipboard 

{
   affected: [
      {
         package: {
            ecosystem: "PyPI",
            name: "bottle",
            purl: "pkg:pypi/bottle",
         },
         ranges: [
            {
               events: [
                  {
                     introduced: "0",
                  },
                  {
                     fixed: "6d7e13da0f998820800ecb3fe9ccee4189aefb54",
                  },
               ],
               repo: "https://github.com/bottlepy/bottle",
               type: "GIT",
            },
            {
               events: [
                  {
                     introduced: "0.10.1",
                  },
                  {
                     fixed: "0.12.11",
                  },
               ],
               type: "ECOSYSTEM",
            },
         ],
         versions: [
            "0.10.1",
            "0.10.10",
            "0.10.11",
            "0.10.12",
            "0.10.2",
            "0.10.3",
            "0.10.4",
            "0.10.5",
            "0.10.6",
            "0.10.7",
            "0.10.8",
            "0.10.9",
            "0.11.1",
            "0.11.2",
            "0.11.3",
            "0.11.4",
            "0.11.5",
            "0.11.6",
            "0.11.7",
            "0.12.1",
            "0.12.10",
            "0.12.2",
            "0.12.3",
            "0.12.4",
            "0.12.5",
            "0.12.6",
            "0.12.7",
            "0.12.8",
            "0.12.9",
         ],
      },
   ],
   aliases: [
      "CVE-2016-9964",
      "GHSA-j6f7-hghw-g437",
   ],
   details: "redirect() in bottle.py in bottle 0.12.10 doesn't filter a \"\\r\\n\" sequence, which leads to a CRLF attack, as demonstrated by a redirect(\"233\\r\\nSet-Cookie: name=salt\") call.",
   id: "PYSEC-2016-24",
   modified: "2021-08-27T03:21:56.402931Z",
   published: "2016-12-16T09:59:00Z",
   references: [
      {
         type: "REPORT",
         url: "https://github.com/bottlepy/bottle/issues/913",
      },
      {
         type: "FIX",
         url: "https://github.com/bottlepy/bottle/commit/6d7e13da0f998820800ecb3fe9ccee4189aefb54",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/94961",
      },
      {
         type: "ADVISORY",
         url: "http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3743",
      },
      {
         type: "ADVISORY",
         url: "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-j6f7-hghw-g437",
      },
   ],
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Security Advisory comment format.

This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.

UUIDv4 of the comment
UUIDv4 of the Vulnerability-Lookup instance
When the comment was created originally
When the comment was last updated
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
The identifier of the vulnerability (CVE ID, GHSA-ID, PYSEC ID, etc.).



Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.