PYSEC-2016-4
Vulnerability from pysec - Published: 2016-09-01 23:59 - Updated: 2021-07-05 00:01
VLAI?
Details
The _Rsa15 class in the RSA 1.5 algorithm implementation in jwa.py in jwcrypto before 0.3.2 lacks the Random Filling protection mechanism, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain cleartext data via a Million Message Attack (MMA).
Impacted products
| Name | purl | jwcrypto | pkg:pypi/jwcrypto |
|---|
Aliases
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "jwcrypto",
"purl": "pkg:pypi/jwcrypto"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "eb5be5bd94c8cae1d7f3ba9801377084d8e5a7ba"
}
],
"repo": "https://github.com/latchset/jwcrypto",
"type": "GIT"
},
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.4.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"versions": [
"0.2.0",
"0.2.1",
"0.3.0",
"0.3.1"
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2016-6298"
],
"details": "The _Rsa15 class in the RSA 1.5 algorithm implementation in jwa.py in jwcrypto before 0.3.2 lacks the Random Filling protection mechanism, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain cleartext data via a Million Message Attack (MMA).",
"id": "PYSEC-2016-4",
"modified": "2021-07-05T00:01:22.078687Z",
"published": "2016-09-01T23:59:00Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "FIX",
"url": "https://github.com/latchset/jwcrypto/commit/eb5be5bd94c8cae1d7f3ba9801377084d8e5a7ba"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://github.com/latchset/jwcrypto/issues/65"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/latchset/jwcrypto/pull/66"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/latchset/jwcrypto/releases/tag/v0.3.2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/92729"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…