PYSEC-2017-40

Vulnerability from pysec - Published: 2017-11-10 09:29 - Updated: 2021-07-05 00:01
VLAI?
Details

Sanic before 0.5.1 allows reading arbitrary files with directory traversal, as demonstrated by the /static/..%2f substring.

Impacted products
Name purl
sanic pkg:pypi/sanic
Aliases

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "sanic",
        "purl": "pkg:pypi/sanic"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.5.1"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ],
      "versions": [
        "0.1.0",
        "0.1.1",
        "0.1.3",
        "0.1.4",
        "0.1.5",
        "0.1.6",
        "0.1.7",
        "0.1.8",
        "0.1.9",
        "0.2.0",
        "0.3.0",
        "0.3.1",
        "0.4.0",
        "0.4.1",
        "0.5.0"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2017-16762"
  ],
  "details": "Sanic before 0.5.1 allows reading arbitrary files with directory traversal, as demonstrated by the /static/..%2f substring.",
  "id": "PYSEC-2017-40",
  "modified": "2021-07-05T00:01:27.045850Z",
  "published": "2017-11-10T09:29:00Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/channelcat/sanic/releases/tag/0.5.1"
    },
    {
      "type": "REPORT",
      "url": "https://github.com/channelcat/sanic/issues/633"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…