pysec-2018-124
Vulnerability from pysec
Published
2018-02-12 22:29
Modified
2024-11-21 14:22
Severity ?
Details
In Exiv2 0.26, there is an integer overflow leading to a heap-based buffer over-read in the Exiv2::getULong function in types.cpp. Remote attackers can exploit the vulnerability to cause a denial of service via a crafted image file. Note that this vulnerability is different from CVE-2017-14864, which is an invalid memory address dereference.
Aliases
{ "affected": [ { "package": { "ecosystem": "PyPI", "name": "exiv2", "purl": "pkg:pypi/exiv2" }, "ranges": [ { "events": [ { "introduced": "0" } ], "type": "ECOSYSTEM" } ], "versions": [ "0.1", "0.11.0", "0.11.1", "0.11.2", "0.11.3", "0.12.0", "0.12.1", "0.13.0", "0.13.1", "0.13.2", "0.14.0", "0.14.1", "0.15.0", "0.16.0", "0.16.1", "0.16.2", "0.16.2.post1", "0.16.3", "0.16.3.post1", "0.17.0", "0.17.1", "0.2", "0.3", "0.3.1" ] } ], "aliases": [ "CVE-2017-17725" ], "details": "In Exiv2 0.26, there is an integer overflow leading to a heap-based buffer over-read in the Exiv2::getULong function in types.cpp. Remote attackers can exploit the vulnerability to cause a denial of service via a crafted image file. Note that this vulnerability is different from CVE-2017-14864, which is an invalid memory address dereference.", "id": "PYSEC-2018-124", "modified": "2024-11-21T14:22:47.758262Z", "published": "2018-02-12T22:29:00Z", "references": [ { "type": "EVIDENCE", "url": "https://github.com/Exiv2/exiv2/issues/188" }, { "type": "REPORT", "url": "https://github.com/Exiv2/exiv2/issues/188" }, { "type": "EVIDENCE", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1525055" }, { "type": "REPORT", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1525055" } ], "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ], "withdrawn": "2024-11-22T04:37:04Z" }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.