pysec-2018-141
Vulnerability from pysec
Published
2018-11-08 08:29
Modified
2024-11-21 14:22
Severity ?
Details
In Exiv2 0.26, Exiv2::IptcParser::decode in iptc.cpp (called from psdimage.cpp in the PSD image reader) may suffer from a denial of service (heap-based buffer over-read) caused by an integer overflow via a crafted PSD image file.
Aliases
{ "affected": [ { "package": { "ecosystem": "PyPI", "name": "exiv2", "purl": "pkg:pypi/exiv2" }, "ranges": [ { "events": [ { "introduced": "0" } ], "type": "ECOSYSTEM" } ], "versions": [ "0.1", "0.11.0", "0.11.1", "0.11.2", "0.11.3", "0.12.0", "0.12.1", "0.13.0", "0.13.1", "0.13.2", "0.14.0", "0.14.1", "0.15.0", "0.16.0", "0.16.1", "0.16.2", "0.16.2.post1", "0.16.3", "0.16.3.post1", "0.17.0", "0.17.1", "0.2", "0.3", "0.3.1" ] } ], "aliases": [ "CVE-2018-19107" ], "details": "In Exiv2 0.26, Exiv2::IptcParser::decode in iptc.cpp (called from psdimage.cpp in the PSD image reader) may suffer from a denial of service (heap-based buffer over-read) caused by an integer overflow via a crafted PSD image file.", "id": "PYSEC-2018-141", "modified": "2024-11-21T14:22:48.973676Z", "published": "2018-11-08T08:29:00Z", "references": [ { "type": "FIX", "url": "https://github.com/Exiv2/exiv2/pull/518" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/Exiv2/exiv2/pull/518" }, { "type": "FIX", "url": "https://github.com/Exiv2/exiv2/issues/427" }, { "type": "REPORT", "url": "https://github.com/Exiv2/exiv2/issues/427" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/02/msg00038.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://usn.ubuntu.com/4056-1/" }, { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2101" }, { "type": "ARTICLE", "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/01/msg00004.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/01/msg00004.html" } ], "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ], "withdrawn": "2024-11-22T04:37:04Z" }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.