PYSEC-2018-39

Vulnerability from pysec - Published: 2018-04-24 16:29 - Updated: 2021-07-02 02:41
VLAI
Details

Ansible before versions 2.1.4, 2.2.1 is vulnerable to an improper input validation in Ansible's handling of data sent from client systems. An attacker with control over a client system being managed by Ansible and the ability to send facts back to the Ansible server could use this flaw to execute arbitrary code on the Ansible server using the Ansible server privileges.

Impacted products
Name purl
ansible pkg:pypi/ansible
Aliases
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "ansible",
        "purl": "pkg:pypi/ansible"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2.1.4.0"
            },
            {
              "introduced": "2.2.0.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2.2.1.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ],
      "versions": [
        "1.0",
        "1.1",
        "1.2",
        "1.2.1",
        "1.2.2",
        "1.2.3",
        "1.3.0",
        "1.3.1",
        "1.3.2",
        "1.3.3",
        "1.3.4",
        "1.4",
        "1.4.1",
        "1.4.2",
        "1.4.3",
        "1.4.4",
        "1.4.5",
        "1.5",
        "1.5.1",
        "1.5.2",
        "1.5.3",
        "1.5.4",
        "1.5.5",
        "1.6",
        "1.6.1",
        "1.6.10",
        "1.6.2",
        "1.6.3",
        "1.6.4",
        "1.6.5",
        "1.6.6",
        "1.6.7",
        "1.6.8",
        "1.6.9",
        "1.7",
        "1.7.1",
        "1.7.2",
        "1.8",
        "1.8.1",
        "1.8.2",
        "1.8.3",
        "1.8.4",
        "1.9.0",
        "1.9.0.1",
        "1.9.1",
        "1.9.2",
        "1.9.3",
        "1.9.4",
        "1.9.5",
        "1.9.6",
        "2.0.0",
        "2.0.0.0",
        "2.0.0.1",
        "2.0.0.2",
        "2.0.1.0",
        "2.0.2.0",
        "2.1.0.0",
        "2.1.1.0",
        "2.1.2.0",
        "2.1.3.0",
        "2.2.0.0"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2016-9587",
    "GHSA-m956-frf4-m2wr"
  ],
  "details": "Ansible before versions 2.1.4, 2.2.1 is vulnerable to an improper input validation in Ansible\u0027s handling of data sent from client systems. An attacker with control over a client system being managed by Ansible and the ability to send facts back to the Ansible server could use this flaw to execute arbitrary code on the Ansible server using the Ansible server privileges.",
  "id": "PYSEC-2018-39",
  "modified": "2021-07-02T02:41:33.713953Z",
  "published": "2018-04-24T16:29:00Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "REPORT",
      "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2016-9587"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/41013/"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201701-77"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1685"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:0515"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:0448"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/95352"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0260.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0195.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-m956-frf4-m2wr"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.