PYSEC-2020-211
Vulnerability from pysec - Published: 2020-01-28 16:15 - Updated: 2021-07-05 00:01
VLAI?
Details
packet.py in pyrad before 2.1 uses weak random numbers to generate RADIUS authenticators and hash passwords, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via a brute force attack.
Impacted products
| Name | purl | pyrad | pkg:pypi/pyrad |
|---|
Aliases
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "pyrad",
"purl": "pkg:pypi/pyrad"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "38f74b36814ca5b1a27d9898141126af4953bee5"
}
],
"repo": "https://github.com/wichert/pyrad",
"type": "GIT"
},
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"versions": [
"1.0",
"1.0alpha1",
"1.1",
"1.2",
"2.0"
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2013-0294"
],
"details": "packet.py in pyrad before 2.1 uses weak random numbers to generate RADIUS authenticators and hash passwords, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via a brute force attack.",
"id": "PYSEC-2020-211",
"modified": "2021-07-05T00:01:25.072912Z",
"published": "2020-01-28T16:15:00Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/57984"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/02/15/13"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2013-September/116567.html"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=911682"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2013-September/115705.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2013-September/115677.html"
},
{
"type": "FIX",
"url": "https://github.com/wichert/pyrad/commit/38f74b36814ca5b1a27d9898141126af4953bee5"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/82133"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…