pysec-2020-99
Vulnerability from pysec
Published
2020-06-01 19:15
Modified
2020-09-02 16:15
Details
Python-RSA before 4.1 ignores leading '\0' bytes during decryption of ciphertext. This could conceivably have a security-relevant impact, e.g., by helping an attacker to infer that an application uses Python-RSA, or if the length of accepted ciphertext affects application behavior (such as by causing excessive memory allocation).
Aliases
{ "affected": [ { "package": { "ecosystem": "PyPI", "name": "rsa", "purl": "pkg:pypi/rsa" }, "ranges": [ { "events": [ { "introduced": "0" }, { "fixed": "4.1" } ], "type": "ECOSYSTEM" } ], "versions": [ "1.1", "1.2", "1.3", "1.3.1", "1.3.2", "1.3.3", "2.0", "3.0", "3.0.1", "3.1", "3.1.1", "3.1.2", "3.1.3", "3.1.4", "3.2", "3.2.1", "3.2.2", "3.2.3", "3.3", "3.4", "3.4.1", "3.4.2", "4.0" ] } ], "aliases": [ "CVE-2020-13757", "GHSA-537h-rv9q-vvph" ], "details": "Python-RSA before 4.1 ignores leading \u0027\\0\u0027 bytes during decryption of ciphertext. This could conceivably have a security-relevant impact, e.g., by helping an attacker to infer that an application uses Python-RSA, or if the length of accepted ciphertext affects application behavior (such as by causing excessive memory allocation).", "id": "PYSEC-2020-99", "modified": "2020-09-02T16:15:00Z", "published": "2020-06-01T19:15:00Z", "references": [ { "type": "REPORT", "url": "https://github.com/sybrenstuvel/python-rsa/issues/146" }, { "type": "REPORT", "url": "https://github.com/sybrenstuvel/python-rsa/issues/146#issuecomment-641845667" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/2KILTHBHNSDUCYV22ODLOKTICJJ7JQIQ/" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ZYB65VNILRBTXL6EITQTH2PZPK7I23MW/" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://usn.ubuntu.com/4478-1/" }, { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-537h-rv9q-vvph" } ] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.