PYSEC-2021-323
Vulnerability from pysec - Published: 2021-08-02 19:15 - Updated: 2021-09-20 14:26Products.isurlinportal is a replacement for isURLInPortal method in Plone. Versions of Products.isurlinportal prior to 1.2.0 have an Open Redirect vulnerability. Various parts of Plone use the 'is url in portal' check for security, mostly to see if it is safe to redirect to a url. A url like https://example.org is not in the portal. The url https:example.org without slashes is considered to be in the portal. When redirecting, some browsers go to https://example.org, others give an error. Attackers may use this to redirect victims to their site, especially as part of a phishing attack. The problem has been patched in Products.isurlinportal 1.2.0.
| Name | purl | products-isurlinportal | pkg:pypi/products-isurlinportal |
|---|
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "products-isurlinportal",
"purl": "pkg:pypi/products-isurlinportal"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "d4fd34990d18adf05a10dc5e2bb4b066798280ba"
}
],
"repo": "https://github.com/plone/Products.isurlinportal",
"type": "GIT"
},
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.2.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"versions": [
"1.0.0",
"1.1.0",
"1.1.1"
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-32806",
"GHSA-q3m9-9fj2-mfwr"
],
"details": "Products.isurlinportal is a replacement for isURLInPortal method in Plone. Versions of Products.isurlinportal prior to 1.2.0 have an Open Redirect vulnerability. Various parts of Plone use the \u0027is url in portal\u0027 check for security, mostly to see if it is safe to redirect to a url. A url like `https://example.org` is not in the portal. The url `https:example.org` without slashes is considered to be in the portal. When redirecting, some browsers go to `https://example.org`, others give an error. Attackers may use this to redirect victims to their site, especially as part of a phishing attack. The problem has been patched in Products.isurlinportal 1.2.0.",
"id": "PYSEC-2021-323",
"modified": "2021-09-20T14:26:43.785985Z",
"published": "2021-08-02T19:15:00Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "FIX",
"url": "https://github.com/plone/Products.isurlinportal/commit/d4fd34990d18adf05a10dc5e2bb4b066798280ba"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://github.com/plone/Products.isurlinportal/security/advisories/GHSA-q3m9-9fj2-mfwr"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN50804280/index.html"
}
]
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.