pysec-2021-890
Vulnerability from pysec
Published
2021-12-17 21:15
Modified
2024-11-25 18:35
Details

Buffer overflow in ajaxsoundstudio.com Pyo &lt and 1.03 in the Server_jack_init function. which allows attackers to conduct Denial of Service attacks by arbitrary constructing a overlong server name.




{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "pyo",
        "purl": "pkg:pypi/pyo"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "1.0.4"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ],
      "versions": [
        "1.0.0",
        "1.0.1",
        "1.0.2",
        "1.0.3"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2021-41498",
    "GHSA-qj27-32wp-ghrg"
  ],
  "details": "Buffer overflow in ajaxsoundstudio.com Pyo \u0026lt and 1.03 in the Server_jack_init function. which allows attackers to conduct Denial of Service attacks by arbitrary constructing a overlong server name.",
  "id": "PYSEC-2021-890",
  "modified": "2024-11-25T18:35:18.357593Z",
  "published": "2021-12-17T21:15:00Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "EVIDENCE",
      "url": "https://github.com/belangeo/pyo/issues/221"
    },
    {
      "type": "REPORT",
      "url": "https://github.com/belangeo/pyo/issues/221"
    }
  ],
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.