PYSEC-2024-242
Vulnerability from pysec - Published: 2024-06-06 19:15 - Updated: 2025-04-08 10:23
VLAI?
Details
A Local File Inclusion (LFI) vulnerability was identified in mlflow/mlflow, specifically in version 2.9.2, which was fixed in version 2.11.3. This vulnerability arises from the application's failure to properly validate URI fragments for directory traversal sequences such as '../'. An attacker can exploit this flaw by manipulating the fragment part of the URI to read arbitrary files on the local file system, including sensitive files like '/etc/passwd'. The vulnerability is a bypass to a previous patch that only addressed similar manipulation within the URI's query string, highlighting the need for comprehensive validation of all parts of a URI to prevent LFI attacks.
Severity ?
7.5 (High)
Impacted products
| Name | purl | mlflow | pkg:pypi/mlflow |
|---|
Aliases
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "mlflow",
"purl": "pkg:pypi/mlflow"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "96f0b573a73d8eedd6735a2ce26e08859527be07"
},
{
"fixed": "96f0b573a73d8eedd6735a2ce26e08859527be07"
}
],
"repo": "https://github.com/mlflow/mlflow",
"type": "GIT"
},
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.11.3"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"versions": [
"0.0.1",
"0.1.0",
"0.2.0",
"0.2.1",
"0.3.0",
"0.4.0",
"0.4.1",
"0.4.2",
"0.5.0",
"0.5.1",
"0.5.2",
"0.6.0",
"0.7.0",
"0.8.0",
"0.8.1",
"0.8.2",
"0.9.0",
"0.9.0.1",
"0.9.1",
"1.0.0",
"1.1.0",
"1.1.1.dev0",
"1.10.0",
"1.11.0",
"1.12.0",
"1.12.1",
"1.13",
"1.13.1",
"1.14.0",
"1.14.1",
"1.15.0",
"1.16.0",
"1.17.0",
"1.18.0",
"1.19.0",
"1.2.0",
"1.20.0",
"1.20.1",
"1.20.2",
"1.21.0",
"1.22.0",
"1.23.0",
"1.23.1",
"1.24.0",
"1.25.0",
"1.25.1",
"1.26.0",
"1.26.1",
"1.27.0",
"1.28.0",
"1.29.0",
"1.3.0",
"1.30.0",
"1.30.1",
"1.4.0",
"1.5.0",
"1.6.0",
"1.7.0",
"1.7.1",
"1.7.2",
"1.8.0",
"1.9.0",
"1.9.1",
"2.0.0",
"2.0.0rc0",
"2.0.1",
"2.1.0",
"2.1.1",
"2.10.0",
"2.10.1",
"2.10.2",
"2.11.0",
"2.11.1",
"2.11.2",
"2.2.0",
"2.2.1",
"2.2.2",
"2.3.0",
"2.3.1",
"2.3.2",
"2.4.0",
"2.4.1",
"2.4.2",
"2.5.0",
"2.6.0",
"2.7.0",
"2.7.1",
"2.8.0",
"2.8.1",
"2.9.0",
"2.9.1",
"2.9.2"
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-2928"
],
"details": "A Local File Inclusion (LFI) vulnerability was identified in mlflow/mlflow, specifically in version 2.9.2, which was fixed in version 2.11.3. This vulnerability arises from the application\u0027s failure to properly validate URI fragments for directory traversal sequences such as \u0027../\u0027. An attacker can exploit this flaw by manipulating the fragment part of the URI to read arbitrary files on the local file system, including sensitive files like \u0027/etc/passwd\u0027. The vulnerability is a bypass to a previous patch that only addressed similar manipulation within the URI\u0027s query string, highlighting the need for comprehensive validation of all parts of a URI to prevent LFI attacks.",
"id": "PYSEC-2024-242",
"modified": "2025-04-08T10:23:24.995743+00:00",
"published": "2024-06-06T19:15:55+00:00",
"references": [
{
"type": "EVIDENCE",
"url": "https://huntr.com/bounties/19bf02d7-6393-4a95-b9d0-d6d4d2d8c298"
},
{
"type": "FIX",
"url": "https://github.com/mlflow/mlflow/commit/96f0b573a73d8eedd6735a2ce26e08859527be07"
},
{
"type": "FIX",
"url": "https://huntr.com/bounties/19bf02d7-6393-4a95-b9d0-d6d4d2d8c298"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://huntr.com/bounties/19bf02d7-6393-4a95-b9d0-d6d4d2d8c298"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://huntr.com/bounties/19bf02d7-6393-4a95-b9d0-d6d4d2d8c298"
}
],
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…