pysec-2024-47
Vulnerability from pysec
Published
2024-03-15 20:15
Modified
2024-03-15 23:20
Details
In Django 3.2 before 3.2.25, 4.2 before 4.2.11, and 5.0 before 5.0.3, the django.utils.text.Truncator.words() method (with html=True) and the truncatewords_html template filter are subject to a potential regular expression denial-of-service attack via a crafted string. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2019-14232 and CVE-2023-43665.
Aliases
{ "affected": [ { "package": { "ecosystem": "PyPI", "name": "django", "purl": "pkg:pypi/django" }, "ranges": [ { "events": [ { "introduced": "3.2" }, { "fixed": "3.2.25" }, { "introduced": "4.2" }, { "fixed": "4.2.11" }, { "introduced": "5.0" }, { "fixed": "5.0.3" } ], "type": "ECOSYSTEM" } ], "versions": [ "3.2", "3.2.1", "3.2.10", "3.2.11", "3.2.12", "3.2.13", "3.2.14", "3.2.15", "3.2.16", "3.2.17", "3.2.18", "3.2.19", "3.2.2", "3.2.20", "3.2.21", "3.2.22", "3.2.23", "3.2.24", "3.2.3", "3.2.4", "3.2.5", "3.2.6", "3.2.7", "3.2.8", "3.2.9", "4.2", "4.2.1", "4.2.10", "4.2.2", "4.2.3", "4.2.4", "4.2.5", "4.2.6", "4.2.7", "4.2.8", "4.2.9", "5.0", "5.0.1", "5.0.2" ] } ], "aliases": [ "CVE-2024-27351" ], "details": "In Django 3.2 before 3.2.25, 4.2 before 4.2.11, and 5.0 before 5.0.3, the django.utils.text.Truncator.words() method (with html=True) and the truncatewords_html template filter are subject to a potential regular expression denial-of-service attack via a crafted string. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2019-14232 and CVE-2023-43665.", "id": "PYSEC-2024-47", "modified": "2024-03-15T23:20:34.975097+00:00", "published": "2024-03-15T20:15:00+00:00", "references": [ { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21forum/django-announce" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/5.0/releases/security/" }, { "type": "ARTICLE", "url": "https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2024/mar/04/security-releases/" } ] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.