PYSEC-2025-33

Vulnerability from pysec - Published: 2025-01-14 18:16 - Updated: 2025-04-23 21:23
VLAI?
Details

Vyper is a Pythonic Smart Contract Language for the EVM. When the Vyper Compiler uses the precompiles EcRecover (0x1) and Identity (0x4), the success flag of the call is not checked. As a consequence an attacker can provide a specific amount of gas to make these calls fail but let the overall execution continue. Then the execution result can be incorrect. Based on EVM's rules, after the failed precompile the remaining code has only 1/64 of the pre-call-gas left (as 63/64 were forwarded and spent). Hence, only fairly simple executions can follow the failed precompile calls. Therefore, we found no significantly impacted real-world contracts. None the less an advisory has been made out of an abundance of caution. There are no actions for users to take.

Severity ?
7.5 (High)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Impacted products
Name purl
vyper pkg:pypi/vyper
Aliases
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "vyper",
        "purl": "pkg:pypi/vyper"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.4.1"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ],
      "versions": [
        "0.1.0b1",
        "0.1.0b10",
        "0.1.0b11",
        "0.1.0b12",
        "0.1.0b13",
        "0.1.0b14",
        "0.1.0b15",
        "0.1.0b16",
        "0.1.0b17",
        "0.1.0b2",
        "0.1.0b3",
        "0.1.0b4",
        "0.1.0b5",
        "0.1.0b6",
        "0.1.0b7",
        "0.1.0b8",
        "0.1.0b9",
        "0.2.1",
        "0.2.10",
        "0.2.11",
        "0.2.12",
        "0.2.13",
        "0.2.14",
        "0.2.15",
        "0.2.16",
        "0.2.2",
        "0.2.3",
        "0.2.4",
        "0.2.5",
        "0.2.6",
        "0.2.7",
        "0.2.8",
        "0.2.9",
        "0.3.0",
        "0.3.1",
        "0.3.10",
        "0.3.10rc1",
        "0.3.10rc2",
        "0.3.10rc3",
        "0.3.10rc4",
        "0.3.10rc5",
        "0.3.2",
        "0.3.3",
        "0.3.4",
        "0.3.5",
        "0.3.6",
        "0.3.7",
        "0.3.8",
        "0.3.9",
        "0.4.0",
        "0.4.0b1",
        "0.4.0b2",
        "0.4.0b3",
        "0.4.0b4",
        "0.4.0b5",
        "0.4.0b6",
        "0.4.0rc1",
        "0.4.0rc2",
        "0.4.0rc3",
        "0.4.0rc4",
        "0.4.0rc5",
        "0.4.0rc6",
        "0.4.1b1",
        "0.4.1b2",
        "0.4.1b3",
        "0.4.1b4",
        "0.4.1rc1",
        "0.4.1rc2",
        "0.4.1rc3"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-21607"
  ],
  "details": "Vyper is a Pythonic Smart Contract Language for the EVM. When the Vyper Compiler uses the precompiles EcRecover (0x1) and Identity (0x4), the success flag of the call is not checked. As a consequence an attacker can provide a specific amount of gas to make these calls fail but let the overall execution continue. Then the execution result can be incorrect. Based on EVM\u0027s rules, after the failed precompile the remaining code has only 1/64 of the pre-call-gas left (as 63/64 were forwarded and spent). Hence, only fairly simple executions can follow the failed precompile calls. Therefore, we found no significantly impacted real-world contracts. None the less an advisory has been made out of an abundance of caution. There are no actions for users to take.",
  "id": "PYSEC-2025-33",
  "modified": "2025-04-23T21:23:01.322686+00:00",
  "published": "2025-01-14T18:16:05+00:00",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/security/advisories/GHSA-vgf2-gvx8-xwc3"
    },
    {
      "type": "EVIDENCE",
      "url": "https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/security/advisories/GHSA-vgf2-gvx8-xwc3"
    }
  ],
  "related": [
    "GHSA-vgf2-gvx8-xwc3",
    "GHSA-vgf2-gvx8-xwc3"
  ],
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.