PYSEC-2025-75
Vulnerability from pysec - Published: 2025-08-11 08:15 - Updated: 2025-08-14 16:24
VLAI?
Details
A safe mode bypass vulnerability in the Model.load_model method in Keras versions 3.0.0 through 3.10.0 allows an attacker to achieve arbitrary code execution by convincing a user to load a specially crafted .keras model archive.
Severity ?
7.8 (High)
Impacted products
| Name | purl | keras | pkg:pypi/keras |
|---|
Aliases
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "keras",
"purl": "pkg:pypi/keras"
}
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-8747"
],
"details": "A safe mode bypass vulnerability in the `Model.load_model` method in Keras versions 3.0.0 through 3.10.0 allows an attacker to achieve arbitrary code execution by convincing a user to load a specially crafted `.keras` model archive.",
"id": "PYSEC-2025-75",
"modified": "2025-08-14T16:24:41.287Z",
"published": "2025-08-11T08:15:26.507Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://jfrog.com/blog/keras-safe_mode-bypass-vulnerability/"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://github.com/keras-team/keras/pull/21429"
}
],
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…