PYSEC-2026-2338

Vulnerability from pysec - Published: 2026-07-13 15:46 - Updated: 2026-07-13 16:03
VLAI
Details

Summary

aiosmtplib's SMTP.mail(), SMTP.rcpt(), SMTP.vrfy() and SMTP.expn() send the caller-supplied email address to the server without rejecting embedded CR/LF (\r\n) bytes. An address that contains a CR/LF is written verbatim onto the SMTP control connection, so the bytes after the CRLF are framed by the server as one or more additional, standalone SMTP command lines. A caller that passes an attacker-influenced sender or recipient address into mail()/rcpt() (or vrfy()/expn()) therefore allows SMTP command injection (CWE-93 / CWE-77): the attacker can smuggle arbitrary SMTP verbs such as MAIL FROM, RCPT TO, RSET, DATA, or AUTH into the session. Injected commands will cause the SMTP instance to hang, but all commands required to complete the envelope could be sent in one address string.

The SMTP.sendmail() command will pass sender and recipient addresses verbatim through to SMTP.mail() & SMTP.rcpt(), and so is also vulnerable. SMTP.send_message() is not affected.

Impact

Severity: medium. Type: SMTP protocol command injection (CWE-93 — Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences; CWE-77 — Command Injection).

When an application built on aiosmtplib derives the envelope sender or any recipient from data an attacker can influence (a web form etc.) and passes it to mail()/rcpt() (directly, or via sendmail()/send() without a Message object), the attacker can:

  • desynchronize the command/response pipeline and cause the aiosmtplib client to hang, resulting in a possible denial of service
  • inject multiple commands in one address to send an arbitrary message

The address only needs to reach mail()/rcpt()/vrfy()/expn(); no attacker control over the SMTP server is required.

Vulnerable versions

Affected version: aiosmtplib 5.1.0 (latest at time of report) and all earlier releases.

Credit

Reported by tonghuaroot.

Impacted products
Name purl
aiosmtplib pkg:pypi/aiosmtplib

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "aiosmtplib",
        "purl": "pkg:pypi/aiosmtplib"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "5.1.1"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ],
      "versions": [
        "0.1",
        "0.1.2",
        "0.1.3",
        "0.1.4",
        "0.1.5rc2",
        "0.1.6",
        "0.1.7",
        "1.0.0",
        "1.0.1",
        "1.0.2",
        "1.0.3",
        "1.0.4",
        "1.0.5",
        "1.0.6",
        "1.1.0",
        "1.1.1",
        "1.1.2",
        "1.1.3",
        "1.1.4",
        "1.1.5",
        "1.1.6",
        "1.1.7",
        "1.1b0",
        "2.0.0",
        "2.0.0b0",
        "2.0.0b1",
        "2.0.1",
        "2.0.2",
        "3.0.0",
        "3.0.1",
        "3.0.2",
        "4.0.0",
        "4.0.1",
        "4.0.2",
        "5.0.0",
        "5.1.0"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-53533",
    "GHSA-v3q9-hj7j-63hq"
  ],
  "details": "### Summary\n\n`aiosmtplib`\u0027s `SMTP.mail()`, `SMTP.rcpt()`, `SMTP.vrfy()` and `SMTP.expn()` send the caller-supplied email address to the server without rejecting embedded CR/LF (`\\r\\n`) bytes. An address that contains a CR/LF is written verbatim onto the SMTP control connection, so the bytes after the CRLF are framed by the server as one or more **additional, standalone SMTP command lines**. A caller that passes an attacker-influenced sender or recipient address into `mail()`/`rcpt()` (or `vrfy()`/`expn()`) therefore allows **SMTP command injection** (CWE-93 / CWE-77): the attacker can smuggle arbitrary SMTP verbs such as `MAIL FROM`, `RCPT TO`, `RSET`, `DATA`, or `AUTH` into the session. Injected commands will cause the `SMTP` instance to hang, but all commands required to complete the envelope could be sent in one address string.\n\nThe `SMTP.sendmail()` command will pass sender and recipient addresses verbatim through to `SMTP.mail()` \u0026 `SMTP.rcpt()`, and so is also vulnerable. `SMTP.send_message()` is not affected.\n\n### Impact\n\nSeverity: medium. Type: SMTP protocol command injection (CWE-93 \u2014 Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences; CWE-77 \u2014 Command Injection).\n\nWhen an application built on `aiosmtplib` derives the envelope sender or any recipient from data an attacker can influence (a web form etc.) and passes it to `mail()`/`rcpt()` (directly, or via `sendmail()`/`send()` without a `Message` object), the attacker can:\n\n- desynchronize the command/response pipeline and cause the aiosmtplib client to hang, resulting in a possible denial of service\n- inject multiple commands in one address to send an arbitrary message\n\nThe address only needs to reach `mail()`/`rcpt()`/`vrfy()`/`expn()`; no attacker control over the SMTP server is required.\n\n### Vulnerable versions\n\nAffected version: `aiosmtplib` 5.1.0 (latest at time of report) and all earlier releases.\n\n### Credit\n\nReported by tonghuaroot.",
  "id": "PYSEC-2026-2338",
  "modified": "2026-07-13T16:03:20.193292Z",
  "published": "2026-07-13T15:46:29.471704Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/cole/aiosmtplib/security/advisories/GHSA-v3q9-hj7j-63hq"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/cole/aiosmtplib"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://pypi.org/project/aiosmtplib"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-v3q9-hj7j-63hq"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53533"
    }
  ],
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:H/SA:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "aiosmtplib vulnerable to SMTP command injection via CR/LF in sender/recipient address"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…