RHSA-2002_229
Vulnerability from csaf_redhat - Published: 2002-12-10 15:23 - Updated: 2024-11-21 22:31Directory traversal vulnerability in wget before 1.8.2-4 allows a remote FTP server to create or overwrite files as the wget user via filenames containing (1) /absolute/path or (2) .. (dot dot) sequences.
| Product | Identifier | Version | Remediation |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Red Hat Linux 6.2
Red Hat / Red Hat Linux
|
cpe:/o:redhat:linux:6.2
|
— |
Vendor Fix
fix
|
|
Red Hat Linux 7.0
Red Hat / Red Hat Linux
|
cpe:/o:redhat:linux:7.0
|
— |
Vendor Fix
fix
|
|
Red Hat Linux 7.1
Red Hat / Red Hat Linux
|
cpe:/o:redhat:linux:7.1
|
— |
Vendor Fix
fix
|
|
Red Hat Linux 7.2
Red Hat / Red Hat Linux
|
cpe:/o:redhat:linux:7.2
|
— |
Vendor Fix
fix
|
|
Red Hat Linux 7.3
Red Hat / Red Hat Linux
|
cpe:/o:redhat:linux:7.3
|
— |
Vendor Fix
fix
|
|
Red Hat Linux 8.0
Red Hat / Red Hat Linux
|
cpe:/o:redhat:linux:8.0
|
— |
Vendor Fix
fix
|
{
"document": {
"aggregate_severity": {
"namespace": "https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification/",
"text": "Moderate"
},
"category": "csaf_security_advisory",
"csaf_version": "2.0",
"distribution": {
"text": "Copyright \u00a9 Red Hat, Inc. All rights reserved.",
"tlp": {
"label": "WHITE",
"url": "https://www.first.org/tlp/"
}
},
"lang": "en",
"notes": [
{
"category": "summary",
"text": "The wget packages shipped with Red Hat Linux 6.2 through 8.0 contain a\nsecurity bug which, under certain circumstances, can cause local files to\nbe written outside the download directory.\n\n[Updated 10 July 2003]\nAdded packages for Red Hat Linux on IBM iSeries and pSeries systems",
"title": "Topic"
},
{
"category": "general",
"text": "Versions of wget prior to 1.8.2-4 contain a bug that permits a malicious\nFTP server to create or overwrite files anywhere on the local file system.\n\nFTP clients must check to see if an FTP server\u0027s response to the NLST\ncommand includes any directory information along with the list of filenames\nrequired by the FTP protocol (RFC 959, section 4.1.3).\n\nIf the FTP client fails to do so, a malicious FTP server can send filenames\nbeginning with \u0027/\u0027 or containing \u0027/../\u0027 which can be used to direct a\nvulnerable FTP client to write files (such as .forward, .rhosts, .shost,\netc.) that can then be used for later attacks against the client machine.\n\nAll Red Hat Linux users using wget \u003c 1.8.2-4 should upgrade\nto the errata packages which are not vulnerable to this issue.\n\nThanks to Steven M. Christey for his work in discovering this issue\nin current FTP clients and for providing a patched FTP server to verify\nthe new packages.",
"title": "Details"
},
{
"category": "legal_disclaimer",
"text": "This content is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). If you distribute this content, or a modified version of it, you must provide attribution to Red Hat Inc. and provide a link to the original.",
"title": "Terms of Use"
}
],
"publisher": {
"category": "vendor",
"contact_details": "https://access.redhat.com/security/team/contact/",
"issuing_authority": "Red Hat Product Security is responsible for vulnerability handling across all Red Hat products and services.",
"name": "Red Hat Product Security",
"namespace": "https://www.redhat.com"
},
"references": [
{
"category": "self",
"summary": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2002:229",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2002:229"
},
{
"category": "external",
"summary": "http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=87602746719482",
"url": "http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=87602746719482"
},
{
"category": "self",
"summary": "Canonical URL",
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/advisories/2002/rhsa-2002_229.json"
}
],
"title": "Red Hat Security Advisory: : : : Updated wget packages fix directory traversal bug",
"tracking": {
"current_release_date": "2024-11-21T22:31:01+00:00",
"generator": {
"date": "2024-11-21T22:31:01+00:00",
"engine": {
"name": "Red Hat SDEngine",
"version": "4.2.1"
}
},
"id": "RHSA-2002:229",
"initial_release_date": "2002-12-10T15:23:00+00:00",
"revision_history": [
{
"date": "2002-12-10T15:23:00+00:00",
"number": "1",
"summary": "Initial version"
},
{
"date": "2002-10-09T00:00:00+00:00",
"number": "2",
"summary": "Last updated version"
},
{
"date": "2024-11-21T22:31:01+00:00",
"number": "3",
"summary": "Last generated version"
}
],
"status": "final",
"version": "3"
}
},
"product_tree": {
"branches": [
{
"branches": [
{
"branches": [
{
"category": "product_name",
"name": "Red Hat Linux 6.2",
"product": {
"name": "Red Hat Linux 6.2",
"product_id": "Red Hat Linux 6.2",
"product_identification_helper": {
"cpe": "cpe:/o:redhat:linux:6.2"
}
}
},
{
"category": "product_name",
"name": "Red Hat Linux 7.0",
"product": {
"name": "Red Hat Linux 7.0",
"product_id": "Red Hat Linux 7.0",
"product_identification_helper": {
"cpe": "cpe:/o:redhat:linux:7.0"
}
}
},
{
"category": "product_name",
"name": "Red Hat Linux 7.1",
"product": {
"name": "Red Hat Linux 7.1",
"product_id": "Red Hat Linux 7.1",
"product_identification_helper": {
"cpe": "cpe:/o:redhat:linux:7.1"
}
}
},
{
"category": "product_name",
"name": "Red Hat Linux 7.2",
"product": {
"name": "Red Hat Linux 7.2",
"product_id": "Red Hat Linux 7.2",
"product_identification_helper": {
"cpe": "cpe:/o:redhat:linux:7.2"
}
}
},
{
"category": "product_name",
"name": "Red Hat Linux 7.3",
"product": {
"name": "Red Hat Linux 7.3",
"product_id": "Red Hat Linux 7.3",
"product_identification_helper": {
"cpe": "cpe:/o:redhat:linux:7.3"
}
}
},
{
"category": "product_name",
"name": "Red Hat Linux 8.0",
"product": {
"name": "Red Hat Linux 8.0",
"product_id": "Red Hat Linux 8.0",
"product_identification_helper": {
"cpe": "cpe:/o:redhat:linux:8.0"
}
}
}
],
"category": "product_family",
"name": "Red Hat Linux"
}
],
"category": "vendor",
"name": "Red Hat"
}
]
},
"vulnerabilities": [
{
"cve": "CVE-2002-1344",
"ids": [
{
"system_name": "Red Hat Bugzilla ID",
"text": "1616879"
}
],
"notes": [
{
"category": "description",
"text": "Directory traversal vulnerability in wget before 1.8.2-4 allows a remote FTP server to create or overwrite files as the wget user via filenames containing (1) /absolute/path or (2) .. (dot dot) sequences.",
"title": "Vulnerability description"
},
{
"category": "summary",
"text": "security flaw",
"title": "Vulnerability summary"
}
],
"product_status": {
"fixed": [
"Red Hat Linux 6.2",
"Red Hat Linux 7.0",
"Red Hat Linux 7.1",
"Red Hat Linux 7.2",
"Red Hat Linux 7.3",
"Red Hat Linux 8.0"
]
},
"references": [
{
"category": "self",
"summary": "Canonical URL",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2002-1344"
},
{
"category": "external",
"summary": "RHBZ#1616879",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1616879"
},
{
"category": "external",
"summary": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2002-1344",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2002-1344"
},
{
"category": "external",
"summary": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2002-1344",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2002-1344"
}
],
"release_date": "2002-12-10T00:00:00+00:00",
"remediations": [
{
"category": "vendor_fix",
"date": "2002-12-10T15:23:00+00:00",
"details": "Before applying this update, make sure all previously released errata\nrelevant to your system have been applied.\n\nTo update all RPMs for your particular architecture, run:\n\nrpm -Fvh [filenames]\n\nwhere [filenames] is a list of the RPMs you wish to upgrade. Only those\nRPMs which are currently installed will be updated. Those RPMs which are\nnot installed but included in the list will not be updated. Note that you\ncan also use wildcards (*.rpm) if your current directory *only* contains the\ndesired RPMs.\n\nPlease note that this update is also available via Red Hat Network. Many\npeople find this an easier way to apply updates. To use Red Hat Network,\nlaunch the Red Hat Update Agent with the following command:\n\nup2date\n\nThis will start an interactive process that will result in the appropriate\nRPMs being upgraded on your system.",
"product_ids": [
"Red Hat Linux 6.2",
"Red Hat Linux 7.0",
"Red Hat Linux 7.1",
"Red Hat Linux 7.2",
"Red Hat Linux 7.3",
"Red Hat Linux 8.0"
],
"restart_required": {
"category": "none"
},
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2002:229"
}
],
"threats": [
{
"category": "impact",
"details": "Moderate"
}
],
"title": "security flaw"
}
]
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.