rhsa-2003_301
Vulnerability from csaf_redhat
Published
2003-10-15 08:18
Modified
2024-11-21 22:48
Summary
Red Hat Security Advisory: mod_ssl security update for Stronghold
Notes
Topic
An updated mod_ssl package is now available for Stronghold 4 on Red Hat
Enterprise Linux that closes a security issue in certain rare configurations.
Details
Stronghold 4 contains a number of open source technologies, including the
mod_ssl module (which provides SSL/TLS support for Apache).
Ben Laurie found a bug in the optional renegotiation code in mod_ssl
that can cause cipher suite restrictions to be ignored. This is triggered
if optional renegotiation is used (SSLOptions +OptRenegotiate) along with
verification of client certificates and a change to the cipher suite over
the renegotiation. The Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures project
(cve.mitre.org) has assigned the name CAN-2003-0192 to this issue.
Users of Stronghold 4 on Red Hat Enterprise Linux may update to
this erratum package, which contains a backported security fix and is not
vulnerable to this issue.
Terms of Use
This content is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). If you distribute this content, or a modified version of it, you must provide attribution to Red Hat Inc. and provide a link to the original.
{ "document": { "aggregate_severity": { "namespace": "https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification/", "text": "Moderate" }, "category": "csaf_security_advisory", "csaf_version": "2.0", "distribution": { "text": "Copyright \u00a9 Red Hat, Inc. All rights reserved.", "tlp": { "label": "WHITE", "url": "https://www.first.org/tlp/" } }, "lang": "en", "notes": [ { "category": "summary", "text": "An updated mod_ssl package is now available for Stronghold 4 on Red Hat\nEnterprise Linux that closes a security issue in certain rare configurations.", "title": "Topic" }, { "category": "general", "text": "Stronghold 4 contains a number of open source technologies, including the\nmod_ssl module (which provides SSL/TLS support for Apache).\n\nBen Laurie found a bug in the optional renegotiation code in mod_ssl\nthat can cause cipher suite restrictions to be ignored. This is triggered\nif optional renegotiation is used (SSLOptions +OptRenegotiate) along with\nverification of client certificates and a change to the cipher suite over\nthe renegotiation. The Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures project\n(cve.mitre.org) has assigned the name CAN-2003-0192 to this issue.\n\nUsers of Stronghold 4 on Red Hat Enterprise Linux may update to\nthis erratum package, which contains a backported security fix and is not\nvulnerable to this issue.", "title": "Details" }, { "category": "legal_disclaimer", "text": "This content is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). If you distribute this content, or a modified version of it, you must provide attribution to Red Hat Inc. and provide a link to the original.", "title": "Terms of Use" } ], "publisher": { "category": "vendor", "contact_details": "https://access.redhat.com/security/team/contact/", "issuing_authority": "Red Hat Product Security is responsible for vulnerability handling across all Red Hat products and services.", "name": "Red Hat Product Security", "namespace": "https://www.redhat.com" }, "references": [ { "category": "self", "summary": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2003:301", "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2003:301" }, { "category": "external", "summary": "https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification/#moderate", "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification/#moderate" }, { "category": "self", "summary": "Canonical URL", "url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/advisories/2003/rhsa-2003_301.json" } ], "title": "Red Hat Security Advisory: mod_ssl security update for Stronghold", "tracking": { "current_release_date": "2024-11-21T22:48:48+00:00", "generator": { "date": "2024-11-21T22:48:48+00:00", "engine": { "name": "Red Hat SDEngine", "version": "4.2.1" } }, "id": "RHSA-2003:301", "initial_release_date": "2003-10-15T08:18:00+00:00", "revision_history": [ { "date": "2003-10-15T08:18:00+00:00", "number": "1", "summary": "Initial version" }, { "date": "2003-10-15T00:00:00+00:00", "number": "2", "summary": "Last updated version" }, { "date": "2024-11-21T22:48:48+00:00", "number": "3", "summary": "Last generated version" } ], "status": "final", "version": "3" } }, "product_tree": { "branches": [ { "branches": [ { "branches": [ { "category": "product_name", "name": "Stronghold 4 for Red Hat Enterprise Linux", "product": { "name": "Stronghold 4 for Red Hat Enterprise Linux", "product_id": "Stronghold 4 for Red Hat Enterprise Linux", "product_identification_helper": { "cpe": "cpe:/a:redhat:rhel_stronghold:4" } } } ], "category": "product_family", "name": "Stronghold 4.0 for Red Hat Enterprise Linux" } ], "category": "vendor", "name": "Red Hat" } ] }, "vulnerabilities": [ { "cve": "CVE-2003-0192", "ids": [ { "system_name": "Red Hat Bugzilla ID", "text": "1616998" } ], "notes": [ { "category": "description", "text": "Apache 2 before 2.0.47, and certain versions of mod_ssl for Apache 1.3, do not properly handle \"certain sequences of per-directory renegotiations and the SSLCipherSuite directive being used to upgrade from a weak ciphersuite to a strong one,\" which could cause Apache to use the weak ciphersuite.", "title": "Vulnerability description" }, { "category": "summary", "text": "security flaw", "title": "Vulnerability summary" }, { "category": "other", "text": "This issue affected Red Hat Enterprise Linux 2.1 and an update was released to correct it:\nhttp://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2003-244.html\n\nRed Hat Enterprise Linux 3 contained a backported patch to correct this issue since release. This issue does not affect the versions of Apache in Enterprise Linux 4 or later.", "title": "Statement" } ], "product_status": { "fixed": [ "Stronghold 4 for Red Hat Enterprise Linux" ] }, "references": [ { "category": "self", "summary": "Canonical URL", "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2003-0192" }, { "category": "external", "summary": "RHBZ#1616998", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1616998" }, { "category": "external", "summary": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2003-0192", "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2003-0192" }, { "category": "external", "summary": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2003-0192", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2003-0192" } ], "release_date": "2003-07-09T00:00:00+00:00", "remediations": [ { "category": "vendor_fix", "date": "2003-10-15T08:18:00+00:00", "details": "Before applying this update, make sure all previously released errata\nrelevant to your system have been applied.\n\nTo update all RPMs for your particular architecture, run:\n\nrpm -Fvh [filenames]\n\nwhere [filenames] is a list of the RPMs you wish to upgrade. Only those\nRPMs which are currently installed will be updated. Those RPMs which are\nnot installed but included in the list will not be updated. Note that you\ncan also use wildcards (*.rpm) if your current directory *only* contains the\ndesired RPMs.\n\nPlease note that this update is also available via Red Hat Network. Many\npeople find this an easier way to apply updates. To use Red Hat Network,\nlaunch the Red Hat Update Agent with the following command:\n\nup2date\n\nThis will start an interactive process that will result in the appropriate\nRPMs being upgraded on your system.\n\nIf up2date fails to connect to Red Hat Network due to SSL Certificate \nErrors, you need to install a version of the up2date client with an updated \ncertificate. The latest version of up2date is available from the Red Hat \nFTP site and may also be downloaded directly from the RHN website:\n\nhttps://rhn.redhat.com/help/latest-up2date.pxt", "product_ids": [ "Stronghold 4 for Red Hat Enterprise Linux" ], "restart_required": { "category": "none" }, "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2003:301" } ], "threats": [ { "category": "impact", "details": "Moderate" } ], "title": "security flaw" } ] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.