rustsec-2017-0003
Vulnerability from osv_rustsec
Published
2017-03-15 12:00
Modified
2023-06-13 13:10
Summary
Hostname verification skipped when custom root certs used
Details
If custom root certificates were registered with a ClientBuilder, the
hostname of the target server would not be validated against its presented leaf
certificate.
This issue was fixed by properly configuring the trust evaluation logic to perform that check.
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"categories": [],
"cvss": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"informational": null
},
"ecosystem_specific": {
"affected_functions": null,
"affects": {
"arch": [],
"functions": [],
"os": []
}
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "crates.io",
"name": "security-framework",
"purl": "pkg:cargo/security-framework"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0.0.0-0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.1.12"
}
],
"type": "SEMVER"
}
],
"versions": []
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2017-18588",
"GHSA-jqqr-c2r2-9cvr"
],
"database_specific": {
"license": "CC0-1.0"
},
"details": "If custom root certificates were registered with a `ClientBuilder`, the\nhostname of the target server would not be validated against its presented leaf\ncertificate.\n\nThis issue was fixed by properly configuring the trust evaluation logic to\nperform that check.",
"id": "RUSTSEC-2017-0003",
"modified": "2023-06-13T13:10:24Z",
"published": "2017-03-15T12:00:00Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://crates.io/crates/security-framework"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2017-0003.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/sfackler/rust-security-framework/pull/27"
}
],
"related": [],
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Hostname verification skipped when custom root certs used"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…